NICfan Posted November 26, 2013 Share Posted November 26, 2013 Miracle was down at 26. Olsen and Childers wrestled and I believe the score was 6-5 childers. Olsen was leading and with about 5 seconds left childers scored 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeyman Posted November 26, 2013 Share Posted November 26, 2013 at 160# the Chesterton wrestler's last name is Hallas. He also beat your #4 ranked LC wrestler last year the only time the two faced off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dad2 Posted November 26, 2013 Share Posted November 26, 2013 Valley and CMA did wrestle they just didn't meet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McWrastlePants Posted November 27, 2013 Share Posted November 27, 2013 Pardus was at 106 a few weeks ago? Why would he be 113? At 106 did tolin and Joseph face off this weekend? No, Chesterton and Portage will not wrestle each other until next week. I do not understand why they do not wrestle at the Chesterton Super Duals. It was on the score sheet that they were going to wrestle this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsfangms Posted November 27, 2013 Share Posted November 27, 2013 No, Chesterton and Portage will not wrestle each other until next week. I do not understand why they do not wrestle at the Chesterton Super Duals. It was on the score sheet that they were going to wrestle this year. If I had to speculate, and that is exactly what I'm doing here, they have to wrestle in a conference dual at some point during the year, so why waste an opportunity to wrestle teams you otherwise won't wrestle during the season by wrestling a conference foe you'll likely wrestle 2-4 times. I'm sure from a rivalry and spectator's perspective it was a let down, but from a coaching perspective it makes perfect sense to get matches versus other teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charger.dad Posted November 27, 2013 Share Posted November 27, 2013 No, Chesterton and Portage will not wrestle each other until next week. I do not understand why they do not wrestle at the Chesterton Super Duals. It was on the score sheet that they were going to wrestle this year. i thought it was odd also.....they were paired up for the last round of the day but it was announced that they would not be wrestling......i asked one of the chesterton wrestlers why and he said it was because they were in the same conference and would be wrestling in a couple of weeks......didn't make much sense to me......there are no rules i know of that say you can't wrestle a team in your conference at a non conference tournament.......maybe neither of them wanted to show their hand at the moment......my guess is if they had wrestled, it would be close but portage would win...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charger.dad Posted November 27, 2013 Share Posted November 27, 2013 If I had to speculate, and that is exactly what I'm doing here, they have to wrestle in a conference dual at some point during the year, so why waste an opportunity to wrestle teams you otherwise won't wrestle during the season by wrestling a conference foe you'll likely wrestle 2-4 times. I'm sure from a rivalry and spectator's perspective it was a let down, but from a coaching perspective it makes perfect sense to get matches versus other teams. it was a 6 team tournament and everyone was supposed to wrestle 5 times so would automatically wrestle everyone there.......had nothing to do with wanting to wrestle other teams because that happened anyway......they just called it off in the final round..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsfangms Posted November 27, 2013 Share Posted November 27, 2013 it was a 6 team tournament and everyone was supposed to wrestle 5 times so would automatically wrestle everyone there.......had nothing to do with wanting to wrestle other teams because that happened anyway......they just called it off in the final round..... I said I was speculating, so clearly I didn't have all of the details as far as the number of teams. I will stick to my original thought process however. They will see each other 3-5 other times during the year, no reason to wrestle a dual that you'll see in a few weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charger.dad Posted November 27, 2013 Share Posted November 27, 2013 I said I was speculating, so clearly I didn't have all of the details as far as the number of teams. I will stick to my original thought process however. They will see each other 3-5 other times during the year, no reason to wrestle a dual that you'll see in a few weeks. other than good quality mat time against good quality opponents.......i would have said lets do it......but someone thought otherwise...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsfangms Posted November 27, 2013 Share Posted November 27, 2013 Correct, someone who gets paid to make those decisions. It's hard enough to win one wrestling match, the more opportunities you give an opponent, the better opportunity they have to learn your tendencies and eventually beat you. I believe it was a sound coaching decision on Joll's part. Not wrestling one match when you more than likely will wrestle over 40 times in a season is not a big deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarlHungus Posted November 28, 2013 Share Posted November 28, 2013 Except in a majority of matchups Chesty is an underdog and and it would seem to benefit thr underdog yo,wrestle motre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mack Posted November 30, 2013 Share Posted November 30, 2013 Armuth Harrison beats Christianson lake central 7-5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charger.dad Posted November 30, 2013 Share Posted November 30, 2013 Correct, someone who gets paid to make those decisions. It's hard enough to win one wrestling match, the more opportunities you give an opponent, the better opportunity they have to learn your tendencies and eventually beat you. I believe it was a sound coaching decision on Joll's part. Not wrestling one match when you more than likely will wrestle over 40 times in a season is not a big deal. that really doesn't make any sense if you look at it as it gives you the opportunity to learn more about your opponent so you can be better and eventually beat them.......so what's the difference?......in the end it's about mat time and rather you "get paid" to make that decision or not, nothing beats mat time regardless of who it is against.....i think most people would have said let's wrestle since in the end there is nothing huge to gain one way or the other......i bet all of the kids would have wanted to wrestle versus not..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ontherise219 Posted November 30, 2013 Author Share Posted November 30, 2013 Armuth Harrison beats Christianson lake central 7-5 at 152 or 60? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ontherise219 Posted November 30, 2013 Author Share Posted November 30, 2013 Armuth Harrison beats Christianson lake central 7-5 any other rankings match ups? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsfangms Posted November 30, 2013 Share Posted November 30, 2013 that really doesn't make any sense if you look at it as it gives you the opportunity to learn more about your opponent so you can be better and eventually beat them.......so what's the difference?......in the end it's about mat time and rather you "get paid" to make that decision or not, nothing beats mat time regardless of who it is against.....i think most people would have said let's wrestle since in the end there is nothing huge to gain one way or the other......i bet all of the kids would have wanted to wrestle versus not..... Last response to this petty pissing match. They didn't wrestle it, so clearly the kids didn't get a vote. The coaches obviously didn't see the value in it, a point of view I happen to agree with, so they didn't wrestle it. There is no rebuttal necessary, they didn't wrestle , period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsfangms Posted November 30, 2013 Share Posted November 30, 2013 at 152 or 60? 152 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charger.dad Posted November 30, 2013 Share Posted November 30, 2013 Last response to this petty pissing match. They didn't wrestle it, so clearly the kids didn't get a vote. The coaches obviously didn't see the value in it, a point of view I happen to agree with, so they didn't wrestle it. There is no rebuttal necessary, they didn't wrestle , period. yep.....you're right.....they didn't wrestle.....but they should have.......no rebuttal necessary.......lol......and i wasn't pissing, just stating the facts..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsfangms Posted November 30, 2013 Share Posted November 30, 2013 yep.....you're right.....they didn't wrestle.....but they should have.......no rebuttal necessary.......lol......and i wasn't pissing, just stating the facts..... I just can't help myself. You did not state a fact sir, what you did was state your opinion, which was that the teams should have wrestled. The fact of the matter is that they did not wrestle. I hope this clarifies fact versus opinion to you. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charger.dad Posted November 30, 2013 Share Posted November 30, 2013 I just can't help myself. You did not state a fact sir, what you did was state your opinion, which was that the teams should have wrestled. The fact of the matter is that they did not wrestle. I hope this clarifies fact versus opinion to you. LOL sportsfan......come on now.......here are the facts....... what's the difference?......none like i said....so i'm right nothing beats mat time......yep that's true....so i'm right most people say wrestle and nothing huge to gain.....yep so i'm right all of the kid's would rather have wrestled.....yep so i'm right all fact's for sure so i'm right...... dang dude i don't know what else to say other than i am for sure right.......lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCKAJC Posted December 1, 2013 Share Posted December 1, 2013 any other rankings match ups? At 106 #4Reitz of Griffith over #5Glogouski of Fairfield by pin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ontherise219 Posted December 1, 2013 Author Share Posted December 1, 2013 At 106 #4Reitz of Griffith over #5Glogouski of Fairfield by pin. Nice that's a good one I wasn't sure if reitz was going to be down yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rookie78 Posted December 2, 2013 Share Posted December 2, 2013 I see the 145 from Laporte (wordlaw) is still ranked out of your semi state, yet he is not on their roster nor did he wrestle at Harrison tourney this weekend. Any idea what's going on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ontherise219 Posted December 2, 2013 Author Share Posted December 2, 2013 I see the 145 from Laporte (wordlaw) is still ranked out of your semi state, yet he is not on their roster nor did he wrestle at Harrison tourney this weekend. Any idea what's going on? No clue that was based off of last years semi state appearance. Did eldrige wrestle 170? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rookie78 Posted December 2, 2013 Share Posted December 2, 2013 No clue that was based off of last years semi state appearance. Did eldrige wrestle 170? Eldridge was at 182 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts