Y2CJ41 Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 WOW this is still going on? Y2 you never answered my question from a long time ago or at least I dont think you did. ??? What question is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimtown 138 Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 Ahh now you have stepped into a bad realm Y2, D3's really can not compete with D1's for 3 reasons 1) Athletic Scholarships are not legal ;-) 2) Practice and training time for D3's is limited much more than D1 3) Recruiting, most d3 colleges can not even compete with NAIA schools when it comes to recruiting athletes. Why? Because NAIA schools can offer scholarships, NCAA d3 is not "allowed" to. (BTW, number 3 was straight from the horses mouth of a D3 VB coach) I've heard rumors that D3 recruiting restrictions might get changed to be more like the NAIA rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2CJ41 Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 Ahh now you have stepped into a bad realm Y2, D3's really can not compete with D1's for 3 reasons 1) Athletic Scholarships are not legal ;-) 2) Practice and training time for D3's is limited much more than D1 3) Recruiting, most d3 colleges can not even compete with NAIA schools when it comes to recruiting athletes. Why? Because NAIA schools can offer scholarships, NCAA d3 is not "allowed" to. (BTW, number 3 was straight from the horses mouth of a D3 VB coach) Why don't they take just work harder and not whine and cry about the disadvantages? They should suck it up and play the big dawgs because in the end, the golf course is the same, the wrestling mat is the same, the tennis court is the same. D1's don't put three tennis players on the court, just one(or two). So what if they don't offer scholarships, they can recruit kids because of the stellar education they would get or the great campus atmosphere. Also, why would you believe a D3 volleyball coach on her/his experiences at a D3 school, yet won't listen to a small school wrestling coach? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarlHungus Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 Ahh now you have stepped into a bad realm Y2, D3's really can not compete with D1's for 3 reasons 1) Athletic Scholarships are not legal ;-) 2) Practice and training time for D3's is limited much more than D1 3) Recruiting, most d3 colleges can not even compete with NAIA schools when it comes to recruiting athletes. Why? Because NAIA schools can offer scholarships, NCAA d3 is not "allowed" to. (BTW, number 3 was straight from the horses mouth of a D3 VB coach) So it sounds like Div. 1 schools have access to a larger pool of athletes due to the lack of restrictions? Is this a correct assumption? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimtown 138 Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 So it sounds like Div. 1 schools have access to a larger pool of athletes due to the lack of restrictions? Is this a correct assumption? I would say it would be more like "deeper pockets"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidersview Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 What question is that? you were complaining a while back on this thread about how its a disadvantage for kids like McCray and some other kids about how they have to play multi-sports and they cannot focus on one sport and I brung up how MD has had tons of State champions in more than one sport. All of the wrestlers play football.. But this thread has moved on from that you guys are talking about recruiting so if you dont wish to put forth your opinion for that I understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarlHungus Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 whats the question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galagore Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 I was being silly with my posts btw, but on a somewhat serious not, anderson is a D3 college, so not only are they smaller than many D1 colleges, they also are not allowed to offer "athletic scholarships." However, any other scholarship which might only be available to give to athletes but not called an "athletic scholarship" is allowed. ;-) Break the addiction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pin2win1 Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 I've heard rumors that D3 recruiting restrictions might get changed to be more like the NAIA rules. good, i am glad they would finally allow scholarships to athletes out in the open rather than skirt around the rules, talk about lack of integrity. Why don't they take just work harder and not whine and cry about the disadvantages? They should suck it up and play the big dawgs because in the end, the golf course is the same, the wrestling mat is the same, the tennis court is the same. D1's don't put three tennis players on the court, just one(or two). So what if they don't offer scholarships, they can recruit kids because of the stellar education they would get or the great campus atmosphere. Also, why would you believe a D3 volleyball coach on her/his experiences at a D3 school, yet won't listen to a small school wrestling coach? Because we are comparing apples to oranges when we compare college classes vs high schools classes. Also d3 colleges don't cry about their disadvantages because they choose to put the restrictions on themselves by choosing which level they are in in colleges. Also, D1 schools are going to get the best athletes because they can actually pay them in scholarship money to come the their school, D3's can not, therefore all the best athletes end up at D1's for the most part. Now, I have been out of HS for awhile, but last I knew recruiting was ILLEGAL in HS. HS coaches are not allowed to go out and gather the best athletes and bring them into their programs, colleges are. Like i began the respos, I will end it, this comparision is apples to oranges, lets keep them at apples to apples. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarlHungus Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 I would say it would be more like "deeper pockets"... Which gives them access to more athletes? Is that assumption correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarlHungus Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 Also d3 colleges don't cry about their disadvantages because they choose to put the restrictions on themselves by choosing which level they are in in colleges. Of course they're not crying. Because the compete in a classed system. Also, D1 schools are going to get the best athletes because they can actually pay them in scholarship money to come the their school, D3's can not, therefore all the best athletes end up at D1's for the most part. Now, I have been out of HS for awhile, but last I knew recruiting was ILLEGAL in HS. HS coaches are not allowed to go out and gather the best athletes and bring them into their programs, colleges are. Like i began the respos, I will end it, this comparision is apples to oranges, lets keep them at apples to apples. So those that offer scholorships have access to more athletes? Is that a correct assumption? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimtown 138 Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 Which gives them access to more athletes? Is that assumption correct? I would say so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidersview Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 whats the question? oh yes I apologize. I guess it really wasnt a question more of me arguing with y2. But he is usually good about responding and we were going at it for a while then he did not reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimtown 138 Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 Of course they're not crying. Because the compete in a classed system. So those that offer scholorships have access to more athletes? Is that a correct assumption? There's a lot of "open" tourneys, so it's not all classed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pin2win1 Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 Which gives them access to more athletes? Is that assumption correct? Which gives them access to RECRUIT more and better athletes. Completely different from a High School. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pin2win1 Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 There's a lot of "open" tourneys, so it's not all classed. Well i am not sure about how wrestling works at the d3 level, AU dropped their team years ago, before I was alive i think. They did once play Ball State as an exibition game I believe, that was pretty ugly if i remember correct hahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarlHungus Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 Which gives them access to RECRUIT more and better athletes. Completely different from a High School. So someone recruiting the hallways for wrestlers at Ben Davis does not have an advantage over someone recruiting the hallways at Turkey Run? Iowa can recruit nearly any wrestler in the country...Manchester's pool of wrestlers is much smaller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarlHungus Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 There's a lot of "open" tourneys, so it's not all classed. Just as there is the Al Smith tourney where Jimtown can test themselves against the big boys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pin2win1 Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 Ok here is the difference karl Iowa can recruit from the same pool that Manchester can recruit from and steal potential Manchester wrestlers. Ben Davis can not recruit from the same pool that Garrett can recruit from. Or any other school for that manner. However, if you go back to some of my earlier posts, I am not against team state being classed. Go ahead class it, if more wrestlers will join Garrett, or John Glenn or any other small school because now they have a legitimate shot at a sectional,regional, or even state championship, go ahead and do it. I understand that as a whole, small schools have a harder time putting together an entire team as opposed to larger schools. However, I do not buy into the idea of classing individuals. Each and every individial has the ability to acheive what their potential will allow them to achieve regardless of their school's size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2CJ41 Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 Because we are comparing apples to oranges when we compare college classes vs high schools classes. Also d3 colleges don't cry about their disadvantages because they choose to put the restrictions on themselves by choosing which level they are in in colleges. Also, D1 schools are going to get the best athletes because they can actually pay them in scholarship money to come the their school, D3's can not, therefore all the best athletes end up at D1's for the most part. Now, I have been out of HS for awhile, but last I knew recruiting was ILLEGAL in HS. HS coaches are not allowed to go out and gather the best athletes and bring them into their programs, colleges are. Like i began the respos, I will end it, this comparision is apples to oranges, lets keep them at apples to apples. Trine picked up an Illinois state champ that chose Trine over Northwestern and a couple other Big 10 schools. Don't tell me that D3's can't out recruit D1's, it can happen with some hard work an dedication. Classes in college and high school have many similarities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pin2win1 Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 Trine picked up an Illinois state champ that chose Trine over Northwestern and a couple other Big 10 schools. Don't tell me that D3's can't out recruit D1's, it can happen with some hard work an dedication. Classes in college and high school have many similarities. refer to the post above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duck_and_run Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 Y2 your saying that D3 schools can compete with D1 schools on an individual basis, just like small schools can compete with larger schools on an individual basis with hard work and dedication. Thank you. The arguement is over game set and match classless individual state tournement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2CJ41 Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 If Manchester and Iowa recruit from the same pool, why aren't they on a level playing field? Why does Iowa always get the big fish and Manchester the smaller ones? They are both in the same pool, they should have an equal chance at getting the fish! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theckman Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 Trine picked up an Illinois state champ that chose Trine over Northwestern and a couple other Big 10 schools. Don't tell me that D3's can't out recruit D1's, it can happen with some hard work an dedication. Classes in college and high school have many similarities. So now size doesn't matter. It's because of hard work and dedication. I must be misreading that, cause it sure sounds like you just shot a big hole in your argument. I could also see something like that happening because the wrestler doesn't want wrestling to interfere with is schooling. D1 wrestling takes up a lot more time than D3, I'm sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duck_and_run Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 Yeah if Metalica and Spike and the Bulldogs are both playing the same city then spike should get just as many fans to by that reasoning. Why would kids go to a school to have a chance at a lesser title. Come on Y2 are you saying that a D1 and D3 title are the same. I am sure there are a ton of D3 guys that call themselves NCAA champions not D1 or D2 champions. My friends from Wittenburg don't even mention class untill I ask them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts