Jump to content

Jay co. Regional


Pg_rated

Recommended Posts

106 -

1. Bollinger DE

2. Cline YO

3. Douglas NO

4. Keen WI

 

113 -

1. Johns BL

2. Moore JC

3. Jackson DE

4. Keith CO

 

120 -

1. Mosier DE

2. Curtis JC

3. Dubach AC

4. Keith CO

 

126 -

1. Rowles JC

2. Daniels UC

3. Bradley CO

4. Stuffel YO

 

132 -

1. Cook AC

2. Reiley JC

3. Boone YO

4. Tuttle DE

 

138 -

1. Wood JC

2. Uhlman AC

3. Brooks DA

4. Meyer SA

 

145 -

1. Clark JC

2. Rhonemus DE

3. Hernandez BL

4. Luginbill BE

 

152 -

1. Davis BE

2. Wittkamp JC

3. Stebbins DE

4. Funk AC

 

160 -

1. Loshe SA

2. Abbott CO

3. Davenport DA

4. Clay DE

 

170 -

1. Myers BE

2. Russell DE

3. Wagoner YO

4. Kahn BL

 

182 -

1. Page MO

2. Summersett SA

3. Wenk JC

4. McCabe NO

 

195 -

1. Currie AC

2. Kukelhan BE

3. Harty MC

4. Luther NO

 

220 -

1. Martin BE

2. New YO

3. Bluhm AC

4. Gehrett BL

 

285 -

1. Waters MC

2. Cruz BL

3. Wurm AC

4. Kahn NO

 

 

Jay County over Delta

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, purdue02 said:

106 -

1. Bollinger DE

2. Cline YO

3. Douglas NO

4. Keen WI

 

113 -

1. Johns BL

2. Moore JC

3. Jackson DE

4. Keith CO

 

120 -

1. Mosier DE

2. Curtis JC

3. Dubach AC

4. Keith CO

 

126 -

1. Rowles JC

2. Daniels UC

3. Bradley CO

4. Stuffel YO

 

132 -

1. Cook AC

2. Reiley JC

3. Boone YO

4. Tuttle DE

 

138 -

1. Wood JC

2. Uhlman AC

3. Brooks DA

4. Meyer SA

 

145 -

1. Clark JC

2. Rhonemus DE

3. Hernandez BL

4. Luginbill BE

 

152 -

1. Davis BE

2. Wittkamp JC

3. Stebbins DE

4. Funk AC

 

160 -

1. Loshe SA

2. Abbott CO

3. Davenport DA

4. Clay DE

 

170 -

1. Myers BE

2. Russell DE

3. Wagoner YO

4. Kahn BL

 

182 -

1. Page MO

2. Summersett SA

3. Wenk JC

4. McCabe NO

 

195 -

1. Currie AC

2. Kukelhan BE

3. Harty MC

4. Luther NO

 

220 -

1. Martin BE

2. New YO

3. Bluhm AC

4. Gehrett BL

 

285 -

1. Waters MC

2. Cruz BL

3. Wurm AC

4. Kahn NO

 

 

Jay County over Delta

Pretty chalk… Was hoping to see some upsets.. haha Thank! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some fun first round matches:

 

106 Byrum JC v Keen Win

126 Daniels UC v Musgrove MC

132 Cook AC v Jett C

145 Luginbill Be v Duncan Win

152 Brandenburg Win v Funk

170 Ullom MonC v Kahn BL

182 Walters Da v McCabe N

195 Tinsman MonC v Luther N

 

Some possible electric semifinal matches:

106 Douglas N v Cline Y

113 Moore JC V Keith C

126 Rowles JC v Bradley C

132 Cook/Jett v Boone Y

152 Stebbins D v Wittkamp JC

195 Harty MC v Currie AC

220 New Y v Bluhm AC

HW Waters MC v Wurm AC

Edited by AJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Thor said:

Tossup as in pickems wise. Still weak sauce. 

I figured the guys on here can take it, not knocking the kids. I saw the wins Hahn had over Moran and McCormick at team state and I totally agree that those were the right picks on that basis. Hahn was small for a heavyweight. He was amazing against Moran of Hamilton Heights, especially. No way he should have been able to handle that kid, but he did! anyway, here, its all talk . I'm just glad I don't have to go out on the mat and back up my talk there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me or does it seem like the Adams County kids are struggling in top & bottom more this postseason than others? All 3 schools (Bellmont, AC, & SA) look really good neutral but aren't riding on top  or getting out/reversals on bottom. Though Kukelhahn has a great switch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.