AJ Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Figured I would start the topic sense it has been discussed on other threads. Delta sectional forfeits (this is a 10 team sectional): 103 - 4 112 - 4 119 - 2 125 - 3 130 - 3 135 - 2 140 - 3 145 - 1 152 - 3 160 - 3 171 - 1 189 - 2 215 - 2 285 - 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cewrestlingfan Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Jennings County Sectional ( 9 Teams) 103 3 112 2 119 1 125 1 130 1 135 1 140 2 145 0 152 0 160 2 171 1 189 1 215 0 285 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrecoCoach Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Zionsville Sectional (12 schools) 103 - 1 112 - 2 119 - 3 125 - 2 130 - 0 135 - 2 140 - 1 145 - 1 152 - 0 160 - 0 171 - 0 189 - 2 215 - 3 285 - 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ Posted January 27, 2009 Author Share Posted January 27, 2009 I did Jay County's as well: 9 team sectional 103 - 1 112 - 1 119 - 0 125 -1 130 - 0 135 - 0 140 - 1 145 - 1 152 - 2 160 - 1 171 - 0 189 - 0 215 - 2 285 - 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insanoflex Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 LaPorte Sectional (8 Teams) 103-2 112-1 119-1 125-0 130-0 135-0 140-0 145-2 152-1 160-1 171-1 189-0 215-0 285-0 9 forfeits total, and most are coming from one school Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2CJ41 Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 I have it in a spreadsheet for release once I get the brackets in, but after getting 14 sectionals here is what I have. 103- 23.74% 112- 21.58% 119-16.55% 125-10.79% 130-10.79% 135-9.35% 140-12.23% 145-8.63% 152-7.91% 160-12.95% 171-10.79% 189-10.07% 215-12.95% 285-18.71% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachRyan_Delta Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Figured I would start the topic sense it has been discussed on other threads. Delta sectional forfeits (this is a 10 team sectional): 103 - 4 112 - 4 119 - 2 125 - 3 130 - 3 135 - 2 140 - 3 145 - 1 152 - 3 160 - 3 171 - 1 189 - 2 215 - 2 285 - 3 Even with 4 forfeits, the 6 that are in this weight make in an amazing weight class. Here are the records of the 6 kids: 25-3 28-4 25-6 23-3 15-2 17-9 I'd say that's pretty solid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scardy94 Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Twin Lakes Sectional 103- 1 112- 3 119- 1 125- 1 130- 2 135- 2 140- 1 145- 1 152- 2 160- 1 171- 3 189- 1 215- 1 HWT- 3 11 Team sectional Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scout101 Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Avon sectional 103....1 112....4 119....1 125....0 130....4 135....1 140....0 145....2 152....1 160....1 171....1 189....1 215....0 285....1 10 teams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scout101 Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 the arguement against getting rid of 103 is null and void with the percentage of forfeits at 112 being almost identical. :o :o :-X :-X :-X :-X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarlHungus Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 the arguement against getting rid of 103 is null and void with the percentage of forfeits at 112 being almost identical. :o :o :-X :-X :-X :-X Either that or it strengthens the argument that 112 is where the 1st weight class should be. No one is advocating getting rid of a weight class, only adjusting the classes to get more kids on the mat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ Posted January 27, 2009 Author Share Posted January 27, 2009 I have it in a spreadsheet for release once I get the brackets in, but after getting 14 sectionals here is what I have. 103- 23.74% 112- 21.58% 119-16.55% 125-10.79% 130-10.79% 135-9.35% 140-12.23% 145-8.63% 152-7.91% 160-12.95% 171-10.79% 189-10.07% 215-12.95% 285-18.71% The spike at 140 and 160 is interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldman Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Is this really being considered, or is this just chatting on the board? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2CJ41 Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Its really being considered by the NFHS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2CJ41 Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Here is what I have after 16 sectionals http://indianamat.com/brackets/ffdistrubution2009.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6minutes Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Great job Y2! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ Posted January 27, 2009 Author Share Posted January 27, 2009 130, 140, and 160 all have noticeable increases. Surprising that 112 currently has more ff's than 103. Good stat work Y2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFlatt Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Mishawaka Sectional 103-3 119-1 125-1 130-1 140-2 145-1 152-3 171-1 Total=13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awood1 Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Y2, I did this years ago ('01 maybe?)and came up with similar numbers. It is adding more work, but it was interesting also as I entered a grade level for each entry and took an average per weight class. What I saw then was that there was a huge jump in the average grade of wrestlers at 112 and below compared to the other weight classes. I am sure I took a beating for saying so, but it suggests that once kids hit puberty very few are able to maintain a body weight of less than 112 lbs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
busstogate Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 It will be interesting to see the change come the day of weigh-ins how this may spike in certain weight classes. However, the possibility of skin DQ's makes this increase somewhat false. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scout101 Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 I guess I remember the days of 13 classes starting at 98 with a little larger spread through the middle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scout101 Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Surpising that Mooresville with only 8 teams has the least amount of ff's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2CJ41 Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Updated with Mishawaka http://indianamat.com/brackets/ffdistrubution2009.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2CJ41 Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Surpising that Mooresville with only 8 teams has the least amount of ff's. Shouldn't a sectional with less teams have less forfeits? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scout101 Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Alright, this grandpa is gettin old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts