Jump to content

Bobby Cox on class sports


ENoblewrestling

Recommended Posts

It's unfathomable that the state would abuse its power to try to eliminate class basketball.

 

Also, Bobby Cox's class argument has convinced me to hop off the fence and onto the side of class wrestling.  Even though he is opposed to class wrestling, his logic and examples make a lot of sense for us to move to classes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. Cox says, "We wouldn’t pit a 3,500-student school against a 300-student school in an IHSAA basketball tournament"

 

Why's it different pitting a 3,500-student school against a 300-student school in an IHSAA basketball game to pitting a 3,500-student school against a 300-student school in an IHSAA wrestling dual?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. Cox says, "We wouldn?t pit a 3,500-student school against a 300-student school in an IHSAA basketball tournament"

 

So why is it different with wrestling?

 

It would actually be harder on wrestling than it would be for basketball.  Using his example, a 300 student school would have about 150 boys.  They would only need to find any 5 with some basketball talent, which is possible since most have probably been around basketball growing up.  With wrestling, they would have to find 14 wrestlers, all at different weights, and most of whom have zero experience with wrestling.  That is near impossible and a huge disadvantage.

 

The only argument the IHSAA has is to call wrestling an individual sport.  Taking away team state makes it easier for them to continue to call it that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would actually be harder on wrestling than it would be for basketball.  Using his example, a 300 student school would have about 150 boys.  They would only need to find any 5 with some basketball talent, which is possible since most have probably been around basketball growing up.  With wrestling, they would have to find 14 wrestlers, all at different weights, and most of whom have zero experience with wrestling.  That is near impossible and a huge disadvantage.

 

The only argument the IHSAA has is to call wrestling an individual sport.  Taking away team state makes it easier for them to continue to call it that.

 

Regardless on whether or not somebody believes wrestling is an individual or team sport (which is a different topic by the way). We're still pitting a 145 lb. wrestler, that comes from a 3,500-student school, against a 145 lb. wrestler, that comes from a 300-student school. So whether it's a "team" sport or "individual" sport is irrelevant based on Mr. Cox's reasoning from this article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless on whether or not somebody believes wrestling is an individual or team sport (which is a different topic by the way). We're still pitting a 145 lb. wrestler, that comes from a 3,500-student school, against a 145 lb. wrestler, that comes from a 300-student school. So whether it's a "team" sport or "individual" sport is irrelevant based on Mr. Cox's reasoning from this article.

 

so a 145 pound wrestler from a larger school weighs more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so a 145 pound wrestler from a larger school weighs more?

 

no but the best 145 that the 3500 enrollment school just by the odds has a higher chance at being better than the one from the 300 enrollment school.....so from that standpoint i see where classed wrestling for the team aspect would be a good thing.....but individually, not in my opinion because the best one person at that weight (which might just come from that 300 enrollment school) will/should rise to the top....and that's in part why indiana has one of the best state tournaments in the country!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.