Here's an interesting article about the Indiana transfer rule. Seems like this is a problem for most sports. I thought interesting that only .48% of transfers aren't granted eligibility. It appears Indiana rules have a lot of exceptions and are typically easy to get around as compared to other states. I think we got to go back to the spirit of these transfer rules. Isn't it in the name of fair competition, the rules are designed to discourage athletes from transferring to schools with better situations and or resources.
Here's my take on this. I think the two athletes transferring to and then away from Yorktown were probably very aware of the ISHAA transfer rules, and I think they calculated and gambled that they would gain their eligibility back. Looks like they've probably lost the gamble at this point. And its pretty apparent that the reason they transferred was very likely for athletic reasons. So under the intent of the rule, no one is getting screwed. I think where it seems unfair to them is that due to the murkiness of the IHSAA rules, most kids find away to avoid the transfer rule and they didn't get the benefit of the Ambiguity.
Also, it looks like Yorktown has benefited from athletic transfers, and if they don't want to play the same game when kids leave. Im just saying, the next time a kid transfers to Yorktown, the AD from the school he just left shouldn't approve the transfer. What goes around comes around.
http://www.indystar.com/story/sports/high-school/2014/08/08/indianas-controversial-high-school-transfer-rules-draw-scrutiny-in-wake-of-eron-gordon-case/13773041/