indygirl Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 It appears that the flagrant misconduct has earned a complete forfeit today. Unfortunate that the emotions got the best of him and erased his history at State. this has happened all year with other wrestlers repeatedly and no action nice to see IHSAA finally taking action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWINfan Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casualwrestlingfan Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Just now, SWINfan said: Looks like New Haven. Radio said he & Harper were beefing from end of the match & into the tunnels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWINfan Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 2 minutes ago, casualwrestlingfan said: Looks like New Haven. Radio said he & Harper were beefing from end of the match & into the tunnels. Seems it would be a lot easier to just say that initially subliminalharp 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1prouddad Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 4 minutes ago, SWINfan said: Seems it would be a lot easier to just say that initially Pretty sure the misconduct was called on the mat after match was concluded. He was initially the winner till the incident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWINfan Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 1 minute ago, 1prouddad said: Pretty sure the misconduct was called on the mat after match was concluded. He was initially the winner till the incident. We got that now. I was referring to the initial post in the thread which gave no specific info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casualwrestlingfan Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 (edited) 17 minutes ago, 1prouddad said: Pretty sure the misconduct was called on the mat after match was concluded. He was initially the winner till the incident. Thought the radio said Harper had won 2-0 and then they were at each other or at least the New Haven wrestler was irritated. Dane mentioned someone needed to separate them in the tunnel before things got really heated. Edited February 17 by casualwrestlingfan Added 1prouddad 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWINfan Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 6 minutes ago, casualwrestlingfan said: Thought the radio said Harper had won 2-0 and then they were at each other or at least the New Haven wrestler was irritated. Dane mentioned someone needed to separate them in the tunnel before things got really heated. Harper finished off the match on the mat with double boots in. After the whistle, Harper rolled off him and as Elkins got up he stepped over Harper and there was a little bravado, but nothing big. As they stood to shake hands, Elkins said something and they ended up nose to nose very briefly. They were separated quickly and Elkins was hit with a flagrant misconduct, deducting 3 team points. What happened after that was not on that camera. I doubt what happened on the mat led to a full DQ, but probably led to it as mentioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2CJ41 Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 34 minutes ago, SWINfan said: Harper finished off the match on the mat with double boots in. After the whistle, Harper rolled off him and as Elkins got up he stepped over Harper and there was a little bravado, but nothing big. As they stood to shake hands, Elkins said something and they ended up nose to nose very briefly. They were separated quickly and Elkins was hit with a flagrant misconduct, deducting 3 team points. What happened after that was not on that camera. I doubt what happened on the mat led to a full DQ, but probably led to it as mentioned. The signal the ref made ON THE MAT was flagrant misconduct. He was disqualified due to the actions ON THE MAT. 1prouddad 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWINfan Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 1 minute ago, Y2CJ41 said: The signal the ref made ON THE MAT was flagrant misconduct. He was disqualified due to the actions ON THE MAT. Thanks for the clarification. I didn't know that would erase you from the whole tournament. You can't tell from the video what was said or what may have happened during the match, so it's hard to judge without full context. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pg_rated Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 Does this make him a state qualifier or just a semi state placer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1prouddad Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 27 minutes ago, Y2CJ41 said: The signal the ref made ON THE MAT was flagrant misconduct. He was disqualified due to the actions ON THE MAT. Pretty much what I said. The more we get to "clarify" this, the clearer the incident will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2CJ41 Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 11 minutes ago, 1prouddad said: Pretty much what I said. The more we get to "clarify" this, the clearer the incident will be. There is no need for any more clarity. We are talking about KIDS and no need to go into any more detail. Steven Jones, dawsdad, AnonymousLeprechaun0125 and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts