X_R A T E D Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 What are some predictions on this regional? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Humble Jr. Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Why don't you do some? ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Humble Jr. Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 106: Stephenson, Mendez, Mosser, Richardson 113: Wills, Hiestand, Becker, Abbott 120: Can’t do this one :/ 126: McCormick, Gray, Ray, Coates 132: Campbell, Bates, Hutker, Brown 138: Ellinger, Stephenson, Gill, Beeks 145: Marbach, Liter, Neher, Rench 152: Carroll, Gray, Braun, Finnerty 160: Baumgartner, Hiestand, Angiiuano, Maddox 170: Luginbill, Jackson, Baker, Evans 182: Hinshaw, Gough, Howard, Taylor 195: Hiestand, Hangen, Burk, Robertson 220: Little, Shaneyfelt, Phillips, Miller 285: Hemmelgarn, Connell, Hiestand, Bollenbacher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigmak Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 bigmak's prediction: 106 stephenson, mendez, cassel, richardson 113 wills, becker, heistand, abbot 120 miller, laughlin, torbush, gunsett 126 mccormick, gray, ray, coats 132 campbell, brown, bates, ford 138 ellinger, stephenson, gill, shaw 145 marbach, liter, calhoun, rench 152 carrol, gray, braun, finnerty 160 hiestand, maddox, baumgartner, anguiano 170 jackson, luginbill, evans, quinn 182 hinshaw, gough, howard-anderson, terriquez 195 hiestand, hangen, robertson, hill 220 little, phillips, shaneyfelt, sofronko 285 hemmelgarn, connell, hiestand, bollenbacher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
74smack Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Jeez BigMak, You are still underestimating Baumgartner even after he put an embarrassing beatdown on your Union City guy. He already had a good match with Hiestand this year losing 4-0. You should step out of middle school level schedule of wrestling that you watch and realize their is a world outside the Elite T.E.C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bog190 Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Jeez BigMak, You are still underestimating Baumgartner even after he put an embarrassing beatdown on your Union City guy. He already had a good match with Hiestand this year losing 4-0. You should step out of middle school level schedule of wrestling that you watch and realize their is a world outside the Elite T.E.C. Geez 74smack, bigmak picked Baumgartner in the matchup with the Union City kid. Take it easy big fella. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlevito Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Geez 74smack, bigmak picked Baumgartner in the matchup with the Union City kid. Take it easy big fella. Not at first... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigmak Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Jeez BigMak, You are still underestimating Baumgartner even after he put an embarrassing beatdown on your Union City guy. He already had a good match with Hiestand this year losing 4-0. You should step out of middle school level schedule of wrestling that you watch and realize their is a world outside the Elite T.E.C. fo realz! i was like, wtf...i picked him over UC kid...matter of fact, UC kid is all hype, said it the other week after watching him struggle with average wrestlers in conference. for your info, i watch way better comp than the TEC, its just the TEC has the best group of characters and kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigmak Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Not at first... you are drunk too, i have not modified that post, read again lmao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bog190 Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Not at first... Thanks for the clarification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigmak Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Thanks for the clarification. nothing is clarified...when you modify a post, it shows its been modified. i never had UC over baumgertner so not sure why these guys are trippin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
et1 Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Hostility! Folks we just need to relax a little and focus on quality wrestling not schedule strength. We are not on the BCS committee for pete's sake! ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
74smack Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 you are drunk too, i have not modified that post, read again lmao You did modify the post after you made this post. "i just changed my mind at 160. i just looked up belmonts 160 and he is quite the impressive freshman. his 5 losses would also be union citys 5 losses. union city just doesnt wrestle anything close to the bellmont schedule" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigmak Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 You did modify the post after you made this post. "i just changed my mind at 160. i just looked up belmonts 160 and he is quite the impressive freshman. his 5 losses would also be union citys 5 losses. union city just doesnt wrestle anything close to the bellmont schedule" that was for sectional. that wasnt even in this thread. that was the sectional thread. i didnt modify my regional predictions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bog190 Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 You did modify the post after you made this post. "i just changed my mind at 160. i just looked up belmonts 160 and he is quite the impressive freshman. his 5 losses would also be union citys 5 losses. union city just doesnt wrestle anything close to the bellmont schedule" If we're calling out inaccurate sectional predictions, didn't 74smack predict 9 Bellmont champions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
74smack Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 that was for sectional. i didnt modify my regional predictions I was talking about your Sectional picks, and now the pick at Regional of Maddox beating him. I didn't say you had Angiiuano beating him for Regionals. I just thought the pick of Maddox beating Baumgartner was worse than your first choice last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
74smack Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 If we're calling out inaccurate sectional predictions, didn't 74smack predict 9 Bellmont champions? Yeah, that was wrong. I also predicted them getting all 14 to Regionals. That did happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigmak Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 I was talking about your Sectional picks, and now the pick at Regional of Maddox beating him. I didn't say you had Angiiuano beating him for Regionals. I just thought the pick of Maddox beating Baumgartner was worse than your first choice last week. Oh yea. Why didn't you just say so lol. You had me thinking u were drunk again. I get it now. I need to look up Maddox a little I guess. I would like to say I also think I had the most accurate predictions of all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bog190 Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Yeah, that was wrong. I also predicted them getting all 14 to Regionals. That did happen. Went out on a limb on that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Humble Jr. Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Oh yea. Why didn't you just say so lol. You had me thinking u were drunk again. I get it now. I need to look up Maddox a little I guess. I would like to say I also think I had the most accurate predictions of all. You most have missed mine? ??? ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
et1 Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 Yorktown wins all 14 classes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Humble Jr. Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Is there anyway the team competition between Bellmont and Yorktown could be tight? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
decbell1 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Is there anyway the team competition between Bellmont and Yorktown could be tight? Consolidate AC, SA and Bellmont Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X_R A T E D Posted February 6, 2014 Author Share Posted February 6, 2014 106: Stephenson, Mendez, Mosser, Fillers 113: Hiestand, Wills, Becker, Abbot 120: Miller, Laughlin, Torbush, Gunsett 126: McCormick, Gray, Ray, Coats 132: Campbell, Brown, Bates, Huntker 138: Ellinger, Stephenson, Gill, Beeks 145: Marbach, Liter, Neher, Rench 152: Carrol, Gray, Brown, Finnerty 160: Hiestand, Baumgartner, Angiiuano, Maddox 170: Jackson, Luginbill, Baker, Evans 182: Hinshaw, Gough, Howard-Anderson, Terriquez 195: Hiestand, Hangan, Hill, Robertson 220: Phillips, Little, Shaneyfelt, Sofronko 285: Hemmelgarn, Connell, Hiestand, Bollenbacher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
74smack Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Is there anyway the team competition between Bellmont and Yorktown could be tight? It would take a huge effort from Bellmont to make it a tight race considering Bellmont only had two wins in the dual earlier this year. They would have to have one of their best showings and get a lot of help from teams like Adams Central, South Adams, and Jay County to pick up some good wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts