The thing I enjoy about these discussions is we are nitpicking about those at the very top of their craft, at least in Indiana. I don't think anyone is disrespecting Chad Red Jr. at all. He could lose to Lee (or beat him) and he is still a GREAT wrestler. Lee still has 3 years to prove what he has done can be translated to the high school championship level. I see no reason it can't/won't be.
As far as Lee vs. Micic, there is no doubt that Stevan was superior this past weekend. Would the result be different in a rematch in this or another setting? Hard to say. Micic took away Lee's best weapon and kept him from getting to his legs, then countered and got take downs. Very smart, strategic wrestling. Would Lee adjust if they wrestled again? I'm sure he would, but we'd be stupid to think that Stevan wouldn't adjust also. Would freshman Micic beat freshman Lee? Hard to say. The bottom line is they are both unbelievable wrestlers and the years in age difference makes it next to impossible to truly make legit comparisons. That said, while doing so from afar, I really enjoyed watching Micic the last 3 years (thank you internet!) and look forward to doing so the next 4 years at Northwestern. I also can't wait to see Lee for the next 3 years, and his younger brothers to boot.
The Lee vs. Red debate can be very easily answered if they face each other at the Mater Dei Holiday Classic next December. Even if they aren't wrestling in the same class by state tournament time, I see no reason why they can't make it work in December.