oldcoach50 Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 160: Hedger LA 28-4/X X/Kappes BA 6-21 DanceGB 16-11/X Cates OA 9-21/Bishoff EC 28-12 Day CN 24-10/X X/Krom UC 18-11 Hoffrogge Mi 14-15/ X Orschell FC 7-21/ Shaw SD 26-7 170: Harnishfeger FC 26-5/X FFt/Mathews UC 12-19 Amberger BA 15-13/X X/ Vessels CN 22-11 Nesius GB 8-5/ X X/Emerson SD 17-13 Mitts EC 7-6/Friend LA 9-23 X/Prather Mi 16-9 182: Hutchinson EC 23-5/X X/Gerndt FC 3-10 McClanahan SD 15-13/X FFt/Craft Mi 17-10 Bolos CN 32-8/ FFt X/Bourne UC 9-15 FFt Bates/ X X/Black G 24-10 Howard from Bates out due to inj in the EIAC meet - there may be a replacement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldcoach50 Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 195: Hawkins Mi 25-5/X FFt/ Fain FC 11-20 Caddell SD 24-8/X X/Grimes UC 22-10 Nuhring EC 26-12/ FFt X/ Driver CN 16-7 Watkins BA 5-13/X X/Black GB 16-4 220: Lindemann Mi 24-5/X X/Parker UC 3-8 Scheuman GB 22-16/X FFt/Caddell SD 23-9 Widmer FC 9-4/FFt X/Moore EC 26-16 Strub BA 8-12/X X/Marvel CN 33-6 285: BrownEC 35-3/X FFT/Deilkes UC 25-8 Selm FC 17-15/X X/Case SD 18-9 Phillips CN 28-6/ X X/ Lynch BA 11-4 Gauck Mi 8-12/FFt LA X/ Swango GB 29-10 that's it ___ I Hope ___) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KINGoftheMAT126 Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 sucks that Gettinger cant make 113 or 120. but its a good thing he could of damaged his body loosing all that weight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cradlesr4babies Posted January 27, 2012 Author Share Posted January 27, 2012 126: Phillips UC/ X FFt/ Wesley LA Money Mi/ X X/ Lakin FC Strueing EC/X X/ Lane SD Henson BA/ Johnson OA Gettinger CN/ X 132: Frasur UC/ X Schimmel SD/Kersey FC Solomon LA/X X/Salatin EC Chase GB/X FFt/ Nobbe BA Craig Mi/ X X/Fuller UC 2 UC's at 132? ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KINGoftheMAT126 Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 2 UC's at 132? ??? Frasur is from connersville Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cradlesr4babies Posted January 27, 2012 Author Share Posted January 27, 2012 Alright. thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANMAN Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 Wow,, HVY is deep, I believe Deilkes is 25-8 and is unseeded. Alot of good semi final matches expected. The depth of this sectional compared to the other in the Regional, well hmmm.... guess it will be noticed next weekend. Good luck to everyone tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cradlesr4babies Posted January 27, 2012 Author Share Posted January 27, 2012 Wow,, HVY is deep, I believe Deilkes is 25-8 and is unseeded. Alot of good semi final matches expected. The depth of this sectional compared to the other in the Regional, well hmmm.... guess it will be noticed next weekend. Good luck to everyone tomorrow. Thats what the Packers and Saints probably thought in the playoffs too. G'Luck to All wrestlers in whatever sectional they are in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat Stat Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 152: Steele CN/X X/ Haugh Mi Linkel BA/X Precht FC/Barron SD Gramman EC/McClurg LA X/Wilger GB Layman GR/X X/ Edwards UC Assuming one of these should have been OA. Layman (since you have GB for Greensburg elsewhere)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat Stat Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 Assuming one of these should have been OA. Layman (since you have GB for Greensburg elsewhere)? My bad. I see from EIAC that Layman is from Greensburg. So is Wilger from Oldenburg? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANMAN Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 Thats what the Packers and Saints probably thought in the playoffs too. G'Luck to All wrestlers in whatever sectional they are in. If you can't see the difference in the depth of the 2 sectionals, then you live in an alternate reality. Not sure what pro football has to do with high school wrestling, but whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MATCAT Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 :)GREAT JOB, COACH... thank you so very much. It took me a while to get all the brackets filled in. I truly appreciate it. I cannot wait to see some of the matchups. Going to be a great day of wrestling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpartanDog Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 :)GREAT JOB, COACH... thank you so very much. It took me a while to get all the brackets filled in. I truly appreciate it. I cannot wait to see some of the matchups. Going to be a great day of wrestling. Thank You for putting in all of the effort to post these. So MATCAT will the brackets be posted in the same area as the rest of the brackets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cradlesr4babies Posted January 27, 2012 Author Share Posted January 27, 2012 If you can't see the difference in the depth of the 2 sectionals, then you live in an alternate reality. Not sure what pro football has to do with high school wrestling, but whatever. It was in reference to as a person said in another post "shiny records" dont always prevail tourney time, thats all I was trying to get at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANMAN Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 The team race should be between Connersville and East Central, with an outside chance of Franklin County, cause I believe they will have the most champs. I think EC pulls it out by less than 10 pts, but won't be surprised if it's flipped and C'ville wins by 10 pts, or like I said, FC should have the most chanps an if the others can pull some upsets then they have an outside shot at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldcoach50 Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 sounds pretty indecisive to me!! I'm backing up with records now --- as I said and is obvious with the corrections, don't hold me too responsible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigmak Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 The team race should be between Connersville and East Central, with an outside chance of Franklin County, cause I believe they will have the most champs. I think EC pulls it out by less than 10 pts, but won't be surprised if it's flipped and C'ville wins by 10 pts, or like I said, FC should have the most chanps an if the others can pull some upsets then they have an outside shot at it. so in other words...it will come down to just 2 or 3 different teams that can pull out the win and not necesarily the team with the most champs but also not necesarily the team with less champs but more runners ups and/or combination of 3rd /4th place finishers...and if a team can pull an upset here and there then that could change things too. If i was a gambling man, i would put my money on one of those teams in the sectional to score more points than the rest of the other teams to win that sectional. Dont be surprised or shocked to find out that all those teams but one looses the sectionals. I know you believe you think you understood what you think I said but I realize that what you heard is not what I meant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANMAN Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 so in other words...it will come down to just 2 or 3 different teams that can pull out the win and not necesarily the team with the most champs but also not necesarily the team with less champs but more runners ups and/or combination of 3rd /4th place finishers...and if a team can pull an upset here and there then that could change things too. If i was a gambling man, i would put my money on one of those teams in the sectional to score more points than the rest of the other teams to win that sectional. Dont be surprised or shocked to find out that all those teams but one looses the sectionals. I know you believe you think you understood what you think I said but I realize that what you heard is not what I meant. Not the smartest peanut in the turd are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpartanDog Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 so in other words...it will come down to just 2 or 3 different teams that can pull out the win and not necesarily the team with the most champs but also not necesarily the team with less champs but more runners ups and/or combination of 3rd /4th place finishers...and if a team can pull an upset here and there then that could change things too. If i was a gambling man, i would put my money on one of those teams in the sectional to score more points than the rest of the other teams to win that sectional. Dont be surprised or shocked to find out that all those teams but one looses the sectionals. I know you believe you think you understood what you think I said but I realize that what you heard is not what I meant. I completely understood exactly what you didn't mean to say : LOL that is hilarious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MATCAT Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 Kinda like FC had the most #1 seeds for conference and doubled anyone else for champs but lost to EC due to EC receiving ffts. In the first round? It makes us wonder why these boys work so hard all year to be seeded #1. Then they get a bye at tournaments and the #3 and #4 guys get points for ffts. If you look at the brackets for EIAC East Central doubled Franklin Counties forfeits. Maybe that's how they won?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2CJ41 Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 This is absolutely WONDERFUL. You are doing a GREAT job, Old Coach. If I am doing the brackets correctly, they should be easily put up on this site. Can't wait to see how the rest play out. Since you decided to take a jab at me, yes they are easy to put up on the site, REALLY easy when they are sent to me in htm or pdf format. Any other format takes time as I do not have my tools to make the brackets with me at all times and I also work a full time job. Unless you want to pay me to do the website full-time you will have to wait a little bit for the brackets to be posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cradlesr4babies Posted January 27, 2012 Author Share Posted January 27, 2012 Since you decided to take a jab at me, yes they are easy to put up on the site, REALLY easy when they are sent to me in htm or pdf format. Any other format takes time as I do not have my tools to make the brackets with me at all times and I also work a full time job. Unless you want to pay me to do the website full-time you will have to wait a little bit for the brackets to be posted. Rite On Y2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldcoach50 Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 Y2, I hope you realize that i am in NO WAY trying to slight you. That was not my intent at all. As you realize I AM retired and the folks were asking. sorry if i stepped on any toes. You folks all do a wonderful job almost every day. Unlike me, who can occasionally help. That's all sorry. Roy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2CJ41 Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 Y2, I hope you realize that i am in NO WAY trying to slight you. That was not my intent at all. As you realize I AM retired and the folks were asking. sorry if i stepped on any toes. You folks all do a wonderful job almost every day. Unlike me, who can occasionally help. That's all sorry. Roy No my post wasn't towards you, it was toward MatCat who decided to take a jab at me for not having the brackets up fast enough for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANMAN Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 No my post wasn't towards you, it was toward MatCat who decided to take a jab at me for not having the brackets up fast enough for him. I don't think it was meant that way at all. Just that it was possible, someone else said they sent them this morning, I don't know the format, but you sure take offense easily, that much is understood clearly. Have a wondiferous day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts