I get what you are after, but time after time the biggest issue is the 18+1. No way should we mix the class and single class individual tournaments together in my opinion. Also do not like the idea of using the individual tournament as a means to determine the team dual tournament either. We need to have 3 separate tournaments period! My biggest complaint of the old single class dual tournament was the individual sectionals determining which teams advanced.
For the classed individual tournament, we should have 5 to 6 classes. Many in the wrestling community will be opposed to that as well. As I mentioned above, break down into 1A-4A of 64 teams (assuming the weight class has no forefeits). 5A 32 teams (same assumption) and 6A 24 (teams). For 1A-4A you would have 4 semi states that had 16 wrestlers each. The top 4 placers with wrestle backs would go to the 1A-4A classed individual finals that would have wrestle backs as well. For 5A you would have 2 semi states with 16 wrestlers and wrestle backs. The top 4 from each would advance to 5A individual finals where the 8 wrestlers would wrestle with wrestle backs. 6A would be similar to 5A but each semi state would have 12 with wrestle backs. Each classed individual tournament is 2 weeks that can be done in the end of December beginning of January before the single class individual tournament.
For the classed team duals, we need the number of teams in each class that can field either a mandatory 7 weight classes or 8. From then we can break down the classes based off of enrollments and what I call the Mater Dei choice. Treat it just like the football tournament. Let's say every team in each of the 4 classes could fill the mandatory weights and the classes are the same currently. So 1A & 2A would be like 128 team brackets, 3A the 64, and 4A could be rat tailed into a 32 team bracket. 1A & 2A have 8 sites of 16 teams in single elimination. Winner of each 8 would make up the state finals. In 3A have 8 sites of 8 and the winners move on to the finals. 4A have 4 sites with 9 teams and the top 2 from each site move on. Champs of each site get a runner up from another site (hopefully the rankings puts the top champ with "worst" runner up). I'd run these right after the classed individual tournament.
For the single class individual tournament, I'd keep the format similar except with wrestle backs for each week and run it after the classed team dual tournament most likely putting us in March. I do agree with balancing sectionals out more but still staying with geography. Maybe so many sectionals can have so many of each class. However, I'm not sure it's really going to matter too much. The cream rises to the top more often than not.