Jump to content

basic13s

Gorillas
  • Posts

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

 Content Type 

Articles

Coach

Teams

Team History

Wrestlers

Wrestler Accomplishments

Dual Results

Individual Results

Team Rankings

Individual Rankings Master

Individual Ranking Detail

Tournament Results

Brackets

College Signings

Media

State Bracket Year Info

Team Firsts and Lasts

Family History

Schedule-Main

Schedule-Details

Team History Accomplishments

Current Year Dual Results

Current Year Tournament Results

Forums

Events

Store

Downloads

Everything posted by basic13s

  1. Yeah, totally surreal. He eyed the podium for about 15 seconds. I was almost sure he would step to the top and attempt to start the wave.
  2. CNN gets better ratings covering train wrecks than covering spelling bee's
  3. Wash, Rinse, Repeat From hook and half a month ago "Your drum-beating and wild claims will turn people against this kid, not because of him, but by you. Consequently, if he fails, there will be many that will mercilously mock him/you. If that happens I fully expect to see your self-righteous horror at posters "cutting down a kid" You claim he will be on the sectional regional and semi state podiums, but that state is "up to him". I can infer that your incredible coaching will carry him through the first three levels, but you are abandoning him at state? You said in an earlier post "that his wrestling speaks for itself". I could not agree more, because your comments reek of garlic and horseradish. Until then, he is another freshman with a loud-mouth coach. You may opt to double down. He wins a medal and you rub it in my face. Guess what? The only thing worse than a poor loser is a poor winner. At that point, people will actively root against him. He will be another sophomore, with a state medal, and a loudmouth coach. I wish brendon well, and I hope that Danny Bell will put a sock in it." Wake up nimrod. The hudkins bandwagon grows with every word you type. You were absolutely gifted an opportunity that you did not earn and you are already into picking him to beat hudkins? Just shut up. Have you ever heard Harper or Tonte or Hasseman get on this board and say "my 4 seed at this weight has a real shot at beating the #1 kid." No, they don't do that, they are too busy focusing on the task at hand instead of hyping their kids up on the internet.
  4. If you are offended by that, my friend, you won't be long for this board.
  5. So you don't think that the trainers would have let him step on the line for 1 second, the ref blow the whistle, then the South bend coach throw in the towel and default with 8 seconds left in the match?There is no way the trainers would stop this situation from happening. I've seen it be done. Also, fans booing a situation is not always "picking" on a high school kid. My heart hurts when I see these things.
  6. Oh you just wait.. NP state finalist grow on trees. Carroll will tremble at their dominance. Be afraid joe
  7. Everyone said MD was done? I'm sure hook and half and wrestle man were leading that bandwagon. #BobcatBias
  8. Didn't want to look at 6 seeds because a lot of weight classes advanced to 5/6 matches with only wins as forfeits. To place top 4 you usually have to beat someone with a pulse. Your method shows a zero result for a number one seed winning a sectional. I'm not worried about the differential
  9. Ben Davis has like 25,000 less students than IU. You are a real fool if you can't recognize Ben Davis is a small school
  10. Ok here we go. Arbitrary data regurgitation about to commence. I looked at the top 4 seeds in both the castle and central sectionals. If a wrestler met or eclipsed his seed, his minimum seed met is 100% If a wrestler was seeded 2nd and got 4th, it is 0% Here are the results team by team MSM % MD 13 of 14 (92.8%) Memorial 12 of 13 (92.3%) Castle 10 of 10 (100%) Mount Vernon 8 (80%) Gibson Southern 7 of 8 (87.5%) Central 5 of 8 (62.5%) Heritage Hills 5 of 7 (71.4%) Reitz 5 of 6 (83.3%) Pike Central 4 of 6 (66.7%) North 3 of 6 (50%) Tecumseh 3 of 5 (60%) Boonville 2 of 5 (40%) Minimum requirement of 5 top 4 seeded contestants. Observations 1: #smallsamplesize 2: teams with the best MSM % are the teams with the toughest strength of schedule 3: teams with the worst MSM% have the weakest strength of schedule Could be cool to see theory applied to different sectionals whee some teams like Avon, New Pal, etc who wrestle hammer schedules do in relation to their better record counterparts. This literally means nothing, just bored at work. Trying to make my case for employment when decbell starts a wrestling branch of fangraphs
  11. My theory is to test whether strength of schedule has a positive direct corrolation on out placing your seed in sectional. The idea of worse record from tougher comp= lower seed due to record. MR Chastain started a thread on this and I was just trying to quantify it. You being the west sides amalgam of Mike Wicker and Bill James, I thought you'd be a great candidate to try it out.
  12. Dear Hook and Half (aka Curt Zenthopher disciple), please in your spare time take this theory a little further. Can you go back to the central and castle sectionals and take a look at what schools wrestled to, or better than their sectional seed. Say Md had 12 wrestlers place at or above their seed out of 14. That would be an 85.7% seed minimum met. My hypothesis: you will find a positive corrolation in minimum seed met percentage (MSM%) within the schools with the highest strength of schedule. Post hypothesis theory. I imagine GS would swap central on SOS if GS dualed MD.
  13. I'm not sure of how this would work but if the IHSAA sanctioned a three class individual tourney could MD even bump up to 3A? Would there be a legacy system for teams with 3 or 4+ state champs multiple years? Interesting to discuss even though a lot of people are burnt out on class discussion. #CAB
  14. That makes sense. I thought he looked out of shape Saturday and stitches in the hand would definitely account for that. This isn't a big difference between wrestling with stitches and having broken bones. I'll take McDaniel in a rematch. Trust the Tecumseh staff to make adjustments more than MD staff.
  15. Google was invented in 1997. It has evolved in to a very helpful search engine.
  16. basic13s

    120

    That verbal beatdown should win you a medal.
  17. Out of all the 2002-2008 RHS grads, I think Jeremy Kempf was the best. Drew into Mike Lecuda (sp?) Friday night and lost in OT when Lecuda was runner up to Angel Escabedo in 05. The next year he drew in to Chad Biddle when Biddle won state. Ironically the only person that beat him at Semi State both years was Cooper Samuels.
  18. Let me clarify. The only information relevant in this situation is WRESTLER G BEAT WRESTLER A in a heads up match. No one else has wrestled each other and no common opponents. That is all the details you need to this. It's the same situation as the BCA argument. Please pick your seeding method (CAB) (BCA) etc and seed the wrestlers If I'm still sounding like I'm speaking Flemmish, decbell please intervene Just curious
  19. Please Seed these wrestlers. Sectional seeding criteria,six are seeded. Record. Win% A: 30-2 (93.75) B:15-7 (68.18) C: 14-7 (66.66) D: 12-7 (63.15) E: 17-10 (62.96) F: 13-10 (56.52) G: 11-11 (50.00) Only one head to head or common opponent criteria is met. WRESTLER G BEAT WRESTLER A Please seed 1-6 Thanks.
  20. No, I am the C,A,B crowd along with maligned and decbell. You are adding in a factor that would change either scenario. Tsirtsis would be first in both categories because he qualifies for criteria C. Being a semi state quarterfinalist is ahead of win percentage.
  21. NO!!!!!! If B was Jason Tsirtsis he would meet criteria C and be the number one seed as he is a returning semi state quarterfinalist! In the scenario presented no kid was a semi state quarterfinalist so anyone talking about B being a state champ is not looking at the same scenario.
  22. This is a ridiculous argument. You are applying skill to whatever record you choose. Why can't you just say c is the 3x defending champion and his losses came at the Ironman, Dvorak,Beast, and powerade? It is a fallacy in your argument. There is no way to know what skill is possessed by an arbitrary letter assigned to a wrestler. You shouldn't think about strength of schedule or any other intangible factor that might play a role. The seeding criteria is simply a WORDED ALGORITHM! Why don't we ask Mark Durham to run this simulated scenario with the seeding criteria and see what he comes up with.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.