Jump to content

Franklin County sectional


bigmak

Recommended Posts

182  Shirkey CO 28-2

      Haarmeyer UC 9-11

      Bugni SD 18-20

      Guintini EC 15-8

      Orschell FC 16-10

      Nordmeyer BA 7-12

      FF MI

      Hittle RU 29-3

 

195  Harnishfeger FC 20-2

      Bryant UC 8-21

      Cisco SD 19-13

      Mitts EC 19-10

      Cavins MI 19-7

      Meckes RU 4-10

      FF Co

      Hooten BA 27-5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

220  Miller RU 28-7

      FF CO

      Bruner SD 11-4

      Arnold FC 11-12

      Moore EC 26-14

      Parker UC 9-4

      Strub BA 15-13

      Anderson MI 17-6

 

285  Kirk LA 21-2

      FF BA

      Smith SD 17-17

      Hornaday RU 11-11

      Selm FC 18-5

      McConnell EC 17-18

      Spurlock CO 7-15

      Minges UC 20-9

 

 

Here ya go Bigmak...names and records!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was told tonight some brackets may change. For example, heard rumor hooten is out at 195 with mono. If this is true, I feel really bad for him because he was a shoe in for semistate.  Hate seeing a career end with an illness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finals an I hope I have them right

 

106 Schaefer v wilburn

113 deal v Coffman

120 lonneman v McClurg

126 bowers v loos

132 westerfield v Orschell

138 ruberg v Humbert

145 gutapfel v Oswald

152 hill v manning

160 dole v Nobbe

170 Gonzales v Amberger

182 Shirley v hurtle

195 harnishfeger v mitts (could be cavins )

220 miller v Moore

Hvy Kirk v minges

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finals an I hope I have them right

 

106 Schaefer v wilburn

113 deal v Coffman

120 lonneman v McClurg

126 bowers v loos

132 westerfield v Orschell

138 ruberg v Humbert

145 gutapfel v Oswald

152 hill v manning

160 dole v Nobbe

170 Gonzales v Amberger

182 Shirley v hurtle

195 harnishfeger v mitts (could be cavins )

220 miller v Moore

Hvy Kirk v minges

 

It is Cavins at 195

Link to comment
Share on other sites

160 1st Max Dole

      2nd Neal Nobbe

      3rd Kerry Raab

      4th Cody Steele

 

170 1st Colton Gonzalez

      2nd Will Amberger

      3rd Donny Hoffrogge

      4th Emilio Aquino-Morales

Link to comment
Share on other sites

106 1-Schaefer (SD) over Wilburn (MI) by fall

3-Bunch (CO) over Collyer (RU) 10-2

 

113 1-Coffman over Deal 6-2

3-Weber (FC) over Roszell (RU) by fall

 

120 1-Lonneman (MI) over McClurg (UC) 12-2

3-Pace (FC) over Hines (SD) 4-3

 

126 1-Loos (FC) over Bowers (UC) 9-5

3-O’Farrow (CO) over Boggs (SD) 8-4

 

132 1-Westerfield (BA) over Orschell (FC) 9-7 (OT)

3-Oyler (LA) over Cannon (CO) by TF (17-1)

 

138 1-Ruberg (LA) over Humbert (FC) by TF (19-1)

3-Espedilla (SD) over Mitts (EC) 7-4

 

145 1-Gutapfel (EC) over Oswald (UC) 9-2

3-Lane (SD) over Day (FC) by fall

 

152 1-Mianning (SD) over Hill (LA) 5-3

3-Day (CO) over Wilgenbusch (EC) 4-1

 

160 1-Dole (EC) over Nobbe (BA) 12-4

3-Steele (CO) over Raab (SD) 11-4

 

Do not have the rest, so hopefully someone else will post them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rule question, maybe a coach or official can weigh in to educate me. A wrestler at sectional 24 forfeited first round deciding not to wrestle, but then went on to wrestle next round and eventually finish third. I really have no clue what the rules state concerning this circumstance. In my opinion, if a kid does not want to wrestle the first match, and forfeits, than he/she should not be able to wrestle any other matches, but that is just my opinion and if the rules state otherwise than it is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.