infowrestling Posted November 12, 2010 Share Posted November 12, 2010 If you look at the coach's who vote, about 80% of them are from the large division, 20 % are from the medium division, and 0% are from the small division. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smooth34 Posted November 12, 2010 Share Posted November 12, 2010 Does Coach Minch still vote even though he's not the coach at NM anymore? I don't care, just curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattM Posted November 12, 2010 Share Posted November 12, 2010 If you look at the coach's who vote, about 80% of them are from the large division, 20 % are from the medium division, and 0% are from the small division. Well 80% of the coaches are also from the teams the regularly are in the rankings to for that matter. I would assume they were picked for being consistant coaches that have a track record of knowing all the school in that area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarlHungus Posted November 12, 2010 Share Posted November 12, 2010 Well 80% of the coaches are also from the teams the regularly are in the rankings to for that matter. I would assume they were picked for being consistant coaches that have a track record of knowing all the school in that area. Would you then assume that there are no small school coaches that are consistent and have a track record of know all the schools in their area? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattM Posted November 12, 2010 Share Posted November 12, 2010 Would you then assume that there are no small school coaches that are consistent and have a track record of know all the schools in their area? No I was pointing out we should not make the assumption of why certain coaches are in that group other than they are experianced and knowledgeable about the area teams. Because if so we could easily say the reason these certain teams are ranked is specifically because their coaches are on the rankings committee instead of because their teams have a track record of preforming well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dullguy Posted November 13, 2010 Share Posted November 13, 2010 I personally think it would be a wonderful idea to rank the teams by three (3) or two divisions (2) as I suggested in my revamping of the actual team state tournament format in the other web blog that had some great momentum the past fw weeks. If we can not get the IHSWCA and or IHSAA to compile and administer this team wrestling ranking process in a formal fashion this year, I think the ranking team the Indianamat.com Brotherhood has put together could do something in the interim. Have at it Y2 and Team!! Give us your best shot by region for starters!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts