SWSpectator Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Thought for sure this topic would have already started, but after looking at brackets and doing my predictions, I can now see why there is no talk about this Sectional......CASTLE RUNS AWAY WITH IT. They have a legit shot to win the first 11 weight classes, and heck they could even win all 14 on a good day! Only 1 kid not seeded top 4 (Rolley at 195) and I wouldn't count him out from pulling off a couple upsets. With this sectional losing Mt.Vernon, it loses a lot of depth and talent. Predictions: 106: Casebolt, Rice, Hall, Kirchgessner 113: Annakin, Horty, Overton, Yeh 120: Bealmear, Teague, Tucker, Barrett 126: Willis, Craig, Hollowell, Graham 132: Clopton, Craig, Schaefer, Brockers 138: Ramsey, Fehrenbacher, Brockman, Ayer 145: Ninke, McNutt, Hawhee, Durcholz 152: Williams, Nunn, Blair, Pemberton 160: Farmer, Rodgers, Folz, Pollock 170: Dowell, Garnett, Brown, Belli 182: McKinley, Mohler, Sturgeon, Lichlyter 195: Barclay, Gahagen, Rolley, Shaw 220: Norman, Huggins, Sulawske, Porter 285: Lofton, Ohlsen, Hughes, McManus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrestlingforlife Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Thought for sure this topic would have already started, but after looking at brackets and doing my predictions, I can now see why there is no talk about this Sectional......CASTLE RUNS AWAY WITH IT. They have a legit shot to win the first 11 weight classes, and heck they could even win all 14 on a good day! Only 1 kid not seeded top 4 (Rolley at 195) and I wouldn't count him out from pulling off a couple upsets. With this sectional losing Mt.Vernon, it loses a lot of depth and talent. Predictions: 106: Casebolt, Rice, Hall, Kirchgessner 113: Annakin, Horty, Overton, Yeh 120: Bealmear, Teague, Tucker, Barrett 126: Willis, Craig, Hollowell, Graham 132: Clopton, Craig, Schaefer, Brockers 138: Ramsey, Fehrenbacher, Brockman, Ayer 145: Ninke, McNutt, Hawhee, Durcholz 152: Williams, Nunn, Blair, Pemberton 160: Farmer, Rodgers, Folz, Pollock 170: Dowell, Garnett, Brown, Belli 182: McKinley, Mohler, Sturgeon, Lichlyter 195: Barclay, Gahagen, Rolley, Shaw 220: Norman, Huggins, Sulawske, Porter 285: Lofton, Ohlsen, Hughes, McManus Not too bad on your predictions for the most part except for one weight class. There are a couple of others I would argue too but there is the 1 prediction you have that really stands out to me and that's 195. You do realize at 195 - Shaw has beaten Gahagen earlier in the season and just beat Rolley this last Saturday right? Also when he faced Barclay back in December, the final score was a big ol whopping 2-1. We'll see Shaw and Barclay in the finals on this one and I believe this match up will produce some fireworks! Just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWSpectator Posted January 27, 2016 Author Share Posted January 27, 2016 Yep knew all that, but that is why we do predictions, and upsets do happen, and that is one of my upsets I'm predicting. Might not happen, but I feel like any of the Top 5 seeds at 195 could win it. wrestlingforlife 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IU84 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Thought for sure this topic would have already started, but after looking at brackets and doing my predictions, I can now see why there is no talk about this Sectional......CASTLE RUNS AWAY WITH IT. They have a legit shot to win the first 11 weight classes, and heck they could even win all 14 on a good day! Only 1 kid not seeded top 4 (Rolley at 195) and I wouldn't count him out from pulling off a couple upsets. With this sectional losing Mt.Vernon, it loses a lot of depth and talent. Predictions: 106: Casebolt, Rice, Hall, Kirchgessner 113: Annakin, Horty, Overton, Yeh 120: Bealmear, Teague, Tucker, Barrett 126: Willis, Craig, Hollowell, Graham 132: Clopton, Craig, Schaefer, Brockers 138: Ramsey, Fehrenbacher, Brockman, Ayer 145: Ninke, McNutt, Hawhee, Durcholz 152: Williams, Nunn, Blair, Pemberton 160: Farmer, Rodgers, Folz, Pollock 170: Dowell, Garnett, Brown, Belli 182: McKinley, Mohler, Sturgeon, Lichlyter 195: Barclay, Gahagen, Rolley, Shaw 220: Norman, Huggins, Sulawske, Porter 285: Lofton, Ohlsen, Hughes, McManus Thought for sure this topic would have already started, but after looking at brackets and doing my predictions, I can now see why there is no talk about this Sectional......CASTLE RUNS AWAY WITH IT. They have a legit shot to win the first 11 weight classes, and heck they could even win all 14 on a good day! Only 1 kid not seeded top 4 (Rolley at 195) and I wouldn't count him out from pulling off a couple upsets. With this sectional losing Mt.Vernon, it loses a lot of depth and talent. Predictions: 106: Casebolt, Rice, Hall, Kirchgessner 113: Annakin, Horty, Overton, Yeh 120: Bealmear, Teague, Tucker, Barrett 126: Willis, Craig, Hollowell, Graham 132: Clopton, Craig, Schaefer, Brockers 138: Ramsey, Fehrenbacher, Brockman, Ayer 145: Ninke, McNutt, Hawhee, Durcholz 152: Williams, Nunn, Blair, Pemberton 160: Farmer, Rodgers, Folz, Pollock 170: Dowell, Garnett, Brown, Belli 182: McKinley, Mohler, Sturgeon, Lichlyter 195: Barclay, Gahagen, Rolley, Shaw 220: Norman, Huggins, Sulawske, Porter 285: Lofton, Ohlsen, Hughes, McManus Thought for sure this topic would have already started, but after looking at brackets and doing my predictions, I can now see why there is no talk about this Sectional......CASTLE RUNS AWAY WITH IT. They have a legit shot to win the first 11 weight classes, and heck they could even win all 14 on a good day! Only 1 kid not seeded top 4 (Rolley at 195) and I wouldn't count him out from pulling off a couple upsets. With this sectional losing Mt.Vernon, it loses a lot of depth and talent. Predictions: 106: Casebolt, Rice, Hall, Kirchgessner 113: Annakin, Horty, Overton, Yeh 120: Bealmear, Teague, Tucker, Barrett 126: Willis, Craig, Hollowell, Graham 132: Clopton, Craig, Schaefer, Brockers 138: Ramsey, Fehrenbacher, Brockman, Ayer 145: Ninke, McNutt, Hawhee, Durcholz 152: Williams, Nunn, Blair, Pemberton 160: Farmer, Rodgers, Folz, Pollock 170: Dowell, Garnett, Brown, Belli 182: McKinley, Mohler, Sturgeon, Lichlyter 195: Barclay, Gahagen, Rolley, Shaw 220: Norman, Huggins, Sulawske, Porter 285: Lofton, Ohlsen, Hughes, McManus Last time I checked all these boys lace up the same way. I would not count anyone out now. I'm pretty sure the boys on Lincoln Ave and the boys on the hill carry some pride and come from programs that have a long history of competing. There's 2-3 on both teams that could make a lot of noise. Yes, Mt. Vernon is a loss of depth and talent, but Memorial and Reitz both beat them in duals this year. I'm pretty sure these teams will not lie down because the opposing wrestlers singlet says CASTLE or anything else for that matter. Castle is a good upcoming team but they are not MATER DEI as evident in the 46-15 score earlier in the year. wrestlingforlife 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
backtothemat Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 As I posted under another topic, I think Castle has a very good chance of advancing all 14 wrestlers to the Castle Regional. Beyond that, all weight classes are up for grabs. There are zero Nick Lees in this sectional. There may be some Castle favorites, but zero locks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hook and half Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Thought for sure this topic would have already started, but after looking at brackets and doing my predictions, I can now see why there is no talk about this Sectional......CASTLE RUNS AWAY WITH IT. They have a legit shot to win the first 11 weight classes, and heck they could even win all 14 on a good day! Only 1 kid not seeded top 4 (Rolley at 195) and I wouldn't count him out from pulling off a couple upsets. With this sectional losing Mt.Vernon, it loses a lot of depth and talent. Predictions: 106: Casebolt, Rice, Hall, Kirchgessner 113: Annakin, Horty, Overton, Yeh 120: Bealmear, Teague, Tucker, Barrett 126: Willis, Craig, Hollowell, Graham 132: Clopton, Craig, Schaefer, Brockers 138: Ramsey, Fehrenbacher, Brockman, Ayer 145: Ninke, McNutt, Hawhee, Durcholz 152: Williams, Nunn, Blair, Pemberton 160: Farmer, Rodgers, Folz, Pollock 170: Dowell, Garnett, Brown, Belli 182: McKinley, Mohler, Sturgeon, Lichlyter 195: Barclay, Gahagen, Rolley, Shaw 220: Norman, Huggins, Sulawske, Porter 285: Lofton, Ohlsen, Hughes, McManus i like your picks. 132- craig over schaefer? have those two wrestled this year? it should be a good one. lot of motivation in the match; the loser will likely get lee or elpers in the first round at regional. 152- williams over nunn. nunn beat him at siac. was williams ill/injured? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1gold Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 Heard he was sick. Will is peaking at the right time.. My money is on Slick Willie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWSpectator Posted January 28, 2016 Author Share Posted January 28, 2016 Schaefer has been in and out of the line up, not sure how healthy he is, that's why I picked Craig over him. I know Nunn beat Williams last weekend, but I'm going with the senior will come ready to go this weekend and find a way to knock off the talented freshman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
backtothemat Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 Schaefer has been in and out of the line up, not sure how healthy he is, that's why I picked Craig over him. I know Nunn beat Williams last weekend, but I'm going with the senior will come ready to go this weekend and find a way to knock off the talented freshman. Schaefer hurt is wrist on January 2 and has not wrestled since. Last weekend was Will Nunns first action since Mooresville on 12/30. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chasetheankle Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 I agree with the pics. Some could change Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts