JimF Posted January 19, 2011 Share Posted January 19, 2011 MWC seedings?????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Count_the_lights_219 Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 My #1 seed predictions a few number 2's as well 103- SN Kid 112- caston, nelson? 119-johnson pioneer 125-rehn WC 130- Hartley W 135-Holloway C 140- wagoner P 2- Bannon NW 145- Dorris P #2- Redweik C #3- Hileman NW 152-Waley SN 160- Hileman NW 171- Winaman Kid #2- McBurnett NW 189- Masters- WC #2- Rodgers NW 215- tanner WC #2- Whitlock P HWT- Dix W Wrestler of the year, Hileman or Wagoner? Coach of the Year- Holeman NW Conference champs- NW or WC it's a toss up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimF Posted January 20, 2011 Author Share Posted January 20, 2011 Thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doggerz45 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 give bob hays the vote ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bomber Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 What happen to Nethercutt of Pioneer ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sumthintoprove135 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 What happen to Nethercutt of Pioneer ??? Due to injury he wont be there till sectional Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. Larry Doan Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 This is for you Jim, and the North White "Jar head" who is so interested in the MWC: 103 ? 1 Herrera SN 25-3 2 Johnson Pio 16-4 3 Berkshire Cas 25-9 4 Shonk NW 14-13 112 1 Nilson Cas 29-5 2 Inman NW 21-11 119 1 Johnson PIO 30-10 2 Williams NW 26-7 3 Sansel SN 15-8 4 Windsor WIN 10-13? 125 1 Rehn WC 30-3 2 Bell NW 20-9 3 Harvey Cas 18-13 4 Herrera SN 11-16 130 1 Hartley WIN 25-5 2 Little Fron 17-7 3 Holeman NW 6-4 4 Cunningham SN 9-19 135 1 Holloway Cas 33-1 2 Chapman WIN 18-8 3 Mayhew WC 14-7 4 Wiley NW 19-9 140 1 Wagoner PIO 40-1 2 Bannon NW 25-5 3 Lee Cas 17-16 4 Barker WIN 6-12 145 1 Dorris PIO 31-4 2 Redweik Cas 30-4 3 Hileman NW 25-9 4 Pride Fron 9-18 152 1 Whaley SN 26-2 2 Gi[pson Fron 17-6 3 Gonzales Cas 24-10 4 Steffel PIO 4-23 160 1 Hileman NW 26-1 2 Doty WIN 21-7 3 Riviero Cas 8-11 4 Biggs Fron 11-15 171 1 Parks WIN 14-11 2 Grounds Cas 10-7 3 A. Beckley PIO 6-20 4 E. Wireman WC 11-22 189 1 Masters WC 25-3 2 Matthis WIN 12-10 3 Rodgers NW 16-15 4 Andrade Cas 11-13 215 1 Tanner WC 30-3 2 Whitlock PIO 15-13 3 Littlejohn SN 16-7 4 Hahn NW 14-10 HWT 1 Dix 20-2 2 Culp WC 19-3 3 Mangum PIO 35-6 4 Begley NW 10-15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bomber Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 This is for you Jim, and the North White "Jar head" who is so interested in the MWC: Wow this DOAN guy is a CLASS ACT ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. Larry Doan Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Sorry, perhaps "leatherneck" is more apropos since the nuance obviously is above your education and experience level. Please see my name is neither hidden nor obscure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimF Posted January 21, 2011 Author Share Posted January 21, 2011 Thank you very much for the seedings. I know who you are!!!!!!!!! See you soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devildog47959 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 This is for you Jim, and the North White "Jar head" who is so interested in the MWC: 103 ? 1 Herrera SN 25-3 2 Johnson Pio 16-4 3 Berkshire Cas 25-9 4 Shonk NW 14-13 112 1 Nilson Cas 29-5 2 Inman NW 21-11 119 1 Johnson PIO 30-10 2 Williams NW 26-7 3 Sansel SN 15-8 4 Windsor WIN 10-13? 125 1 Rehn WC 30-3 2 Bell NW 20-9 3 Harvey Cas 18-13 4 Herrera SN 11-16 130 1 Hartley WIN 25-5 2 Little Fron 17-7 3 Holeman NW 6-4 4 Cunningham SN 9-19 135 1 Holloway Cas 33-1 2 Chapman WIN 18-8 3 Mayhew WC 14-7 4 Wiley NW 19-9 140 1 Wagoner PIO 40-1 2 Bannon NW 25-5 3 Lee Cas 17-16 4 Barker WIN 6-12 145 1 Dorris PIO 31-4 2 Redweik Cas 30-4 3 Hileman NW 25-9 4 Pride Fron 9-18 152 1 Whaley SN 26-2 2 Gi[pson Fron 17-6 3 Gonzales Cas 24-10 4 Steffel PIO 4-23 160 1 Hileman NW 26-1 2 Doty WIN 21-7 3 Riviero Cas 8-11 4 Biggs Fron 11-15 171 1 Parks WIN 14-11 2 Grounds Cas 10-7 3 A. Beckley PIO 6-20 4 E. Wireman WC 11-22 189 1 Masters WC 25-3 2 Matthis WIN 12-10 3 Rodgers NW 16-15 4 Andrade Cas 11-13 215 1 Tanner WC 30-3 2 Whitlock PIO 15-13 3 Littlejohn SN 16-7 4 Hahn NW 14-10 HWT 1 Dix 20-2 2 Culp WC 19-3 3 Mangum PIO 35-6 4 Begley NW 10-15 Thanks for posting this DLD, as far as the ''JarHead'' comment we have many nicknames shocktroop, leatherneck, war machine, and my personal favorite ''Teufelhunden" ;D just to name a few. I didnt take it as disrespect and trust me being in the Corps Ive learned to have some pretty tough skin! As far as MWC, should be a great day of wrestling! Really excited to see how it turns out GO VIKINGS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. Larry Doan Posted January 24, 2011 Share Posted January 24, 2011 Thanks for posting this DLD, as far as the ''JarHead'' comment we have many nicknames shocktroop, leatherneck, war machine, and my personal favorite ''Teufelhunden" ;D just to name a few. I didnt take it as disrespect and trust me being in the Corps Ive learned to have some pretty tough skin! As far as MWC, should be a great day of wrestling! Really excited to see how it turns out GO VIKINGS! Ahh yes, the German for "devil dogs". No. The secret to true knowledge is knowing where to find the answers. I had no doubt that the nickname would not offend. Those of us who have had the intenstinal fortitude to roll the dice and enlist in a volunteer force, impending or current conflicts not withstanding, understand the true meaning of the given names and usually wear them with a prideful, knowing smile (eight years) for me. Bomber's rush to your defense under the guise of political correctness simply demonstrated for me the continued "wimpification" of today's youth. If it turns out that he or she is an adult, it confirms for me that lack of prior military service is likely a factor of ignorance, ignorance for which a cure cannot be found. It was an enjoyable weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bomber Posted January 24, 2011 Share Posted January 24, 2011 Ahh yes, the German for "devil dogs". No. The secret to true knowledge is knowing where to find the answers. I had no doubt that the nickname would not offend. Those of us who have had the intenstinal fortitude to roll the dice and enlist in a volunteer force, impending or current conflicts not withstanding, understand the true meaning of the given names and usually wear them with a prideful, knowing smile (eight years) for me. Bomber's rush to your defense under the guise of political correctness simply demonstrated for me the continued "wimpification" of today's youth. If it turns out that he or she is an adult, it confirms for me that lack of prior military service is likely a factor of ignorance, ignorance for which a cure cannot be found. It was an enjoyable weekend. WOW!!!! I MUST HAVE GOT TO YOU D. LARRY DOAN??? IT SEEMS LIKE "WIMPIFICATION," "IGNORANCE" AND "EDUCATION LEVEL" HAS A LOT TO DO WITH MY QOUTE EARLIER. "YOUR A CLASS ACT." IT'S NICE TO SEE YOU TAKE GREAT PRIDE IN NAME CALLING Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NWHC 145 Champ Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 Hey D. Larry Doan, what is your interpretation of stalling. As a spectator at the Hoosier Conference Meet I was very confused by your stalling call in the 119lb. finals. The Rensselaer kid was attempting an offensive attack going into his opponent as our kid was trained to do. The opponent chose to back off the mat instead of circling and trying to stay in the required 10ft wrestling circle. According to National Federation Rules the defensive kid should have been called for stalling. What was your reasoning for calling it on the kid that was trying to attack his opponent and score a takedown. Please enlighten me. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. Larry Doan Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 .....IT SEEMS LIKE "WIMPIFICATION," "IGNORANCE" AND "EDUCATION LEVEL" HAS A LOT TO DO WITH MY QOUTE EARLIER. "YOUR A CLASS ACT." IT'S NICE TO SEE YOU TAKE GREAT PRIDE IN NAME CALLING "Quote" It is given in the window. "Your" is a possessive pronoun. You're looking for the contraction "you're". This was fun.... thank you. :-X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bomber Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 Hey D. Larry Doan, what is your interpretation of stalling. As a spectator at the Hoosier Conference Meet I was very confused by your stalling call in the 119lb. finals. The Rensselaer kid was attempting an offensive attack going into his opponent as our kid was trained to do. The opponent chose to back off the mat instead of circling and trying to stay in the required 10ft wrestling circle. According to National Federation Rules the defensive kid should have been called for stalling. What was your reasoning for calling it on the kid that was trying to attack his opponent and score a takedown. Please enlighten me. Thanks! That's funny I guess the D. Larry Doan can't answer that NWHC145 ??? I wasn't there but good question Maybe you could supply some video of that match. It would be nice to see what others have to say about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts