I don't know how anyone else feels about this, but I just watched day two of the Olympic trials and can not undstand how the rules can be so terrible. I am especially upset over the Metcalf and Simmons last match. In both cases, the inferior wrestler won, which brings out a few questions I have. Maybe some of you that are more familiar with freestyle can inform me or complain with me.
- can we even call freestyle wrestling the way it is today wrestling? It looks more like judo to me.
-why is fitness not stressed in freestyle? (I'm serious here) is it because the rest of the world knows how much folk style is stressed in the US and the FILA rules are made to counter our superior fitness?
-why is the passive wrestler rewarded? I particulary hate when two points are awarded when someone is in on a shot and they get flipped to their side 90 degrees for two points.
-what does a push out have to do with wrestling?
-how can there be video review in wrestling?
-winning a top line freestyle match is 50% luck, how can a draw be involved?
Maybe I am just partial to folk style and don't understand the nuances of freestyle, but the best wrestler does not always win unlike folk style. I will say though, the matches were very exciting, probably more than folk style, but it was artificially created drama, not the best man wins.
I wrote this on my iPad, the autocorrect sucks, pardon the errors.