bog190
-
Posts
405 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Articles
Coach
Teams
Team History
Wrestlers
Wrestler Accomplishments
Dual Results
Individual Results
Team Rankings
Individual Rankings Master
Individual Ranking Detail
Tournament Results
Brackets
College Signings
Media
State Bracket Year Info
Team Firsts and Lasts
Family History
Schedule-Main
Schedule-Details
Team History Accomplishments
Current Year Dual Results
Current Year Tournament Results
Forums
Events
Store
Downloads
Everything posted by bog190
-
If you are basing it on population, 1a (which has 13% of the state's student population) should get 29 qualifiers (13% of 224), the last 5 years 1a has 21 (9.4%), 26 (11.6%), 20 (8.9%), 21 (9.4%) and 24 (10.7%). If all is fair individually as you say, the placers should follow student population as well and 1a should have 14.5 placers per year, lets call it 14. The last 5 years 1a has had 5 (4.5%), 1 (less than 1%), 8 (7.1%), 7 (6.3%) and 9 (8%). Each of the past 5 years they have been short on qualifiers, and extremely short on placers. Why is this?
-
I think you are having issues comprehending the data, based on that rambling post. No class advocate thinks it should be 33% for each class.
-
I think that making it to regional means you have a realistic shot at making it to semi-state which in turn means you have a realistic shot at making it to state.
-
That's exactly what you are saying. If not explain why 1A has 13% of the population and 4.5% of the placers?
-
Cause 'Merica
-
There is a list on the IHSWCA website. I'm not sure how accurate it is. Here is a thread in which the same question was asked: http://indianamat.com/index.php/topic/47296-ihswca-team-state-qualification-poll/ -
The selection committee
-
No
-
How many times are you going to suggest this? This is really a pointless question, because I could ask the exact same questions in reverse.
-
I understand just fine, but exaggerating what the suggestion is is ludicrous. You guys love to dismiss Y2 when he says let's have one weight class. Why? Because he exaggerating to make a point, it's the same concept.
-
Thanks for clarifying all of his statements for me.
-
Again making a stupid argument that no one besides you has ever suggested.
-
Nope, speaking from no experience.
-
Many kids that don't wrestle in high school are solid to good wrestlers. Just because they don't wrestle doesn't mean they're bad, but they have football and baseball to play so why wrestle if they can't make it to a high level? You're increasing the incentive for kids like that to come out. Its not a difficult concept.
-
Less participation=good for wrestling in Indiana. Makes sense.
-
You don't think our state would be benefited recruiting wise by showcasing additional wrestlers? It's better for Indiana recruiting to have less individuals make it to the state level?
-
So what in your reply tells us how the single class is beneficial for the sport in our state?
-
Sensitive much?
-
Did you read the first post of the thread?
-
Absolutely
-
Yet 40 or more states can figure it out.
-
The selection committee convenes for a unanimous "no" vote on this issue. Committee members will not be available for comment.
-
Clever
-
State is the only level that would require 6 mats, that would still be at Bankers Life.
-
Worth the wait. Nice work.
- 31 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- fort wayne
- yorktown
- (and 3 more)