I completely agree that this was an issue, as my wrestler at 152 is the one that got hurt most by the seeding. I do not think record versus the opponents in sectional is the best way to seed but I do think it should be a requirement that the team wrestles in at-least a dual or tournament with a school(s) in their sectional. I am not sure why they do not wrestle in city or county based off their location. It makes it very hard to find common opponent and other teams in the sectional have tried to dual them and they have declined. It hurts 2 and 3 seed at the sectional and then also hurts the kid at the other regional as well. If a wrestler does not wrestle against one opponent or school (atleast entered at the same tournament) in their sectional, then I do not think they should be seeded. It also might sound stupid but why not wrestle a true second if you have not lost to the opponent that got second. It might add a total of 7 matches but could also solve some seeding issues heading into regional. We beat Kiner 12-2 during the year and then did not get a chance to wrestle him based off the bracket and he placed higher than us and advanced to semi-state the next weekend. The point of seeding meetings is to separate the best two wrestlers but when schools will not wrestle other schools in their sectional, this makes it impossible.