NickS Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 I saw the other thread and it appears that the win percentage was botched pretty good. So I took it upon myself to attempt to sort out the mess. This is what I came up with. [table] Weight [table]#103#112#119#125#130#135#140#145#152#160#171#189#215#285[/table] Records [table]673-64621-65572-75606-71638-71597-74565-72570-71583-70565-71608-62565-80591-90596-76[/table] Win Pct. [table].913.905.884.895.900.890.887.889.893.888.907.876.868.887[/table] Grade Avg. [table]10.2510.6911.3111.3811.6311.3111.4411.3111.0611.5011.6911.4411.3111.63[/table] [/table] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcatcountry97 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 These mean absolutely nothing. They can be interpreted in 1o0 different ways. 103 could be highest win % because they have a ton of forfeits, and there is such a disparity between the couple of good wrestlers, and all the inexperienced or bad wrestlers at this weak weight. The other weights could have lower % because they are all good, and beat each other throughout the season. Just two examples ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kentonsm Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 "Just two examples!" of 100 different ways to interpret them -Incorrectly. There is only one way to interpret the numbers. That is a given wrestlers winning perecentage- irrespective of how they won or lost. The guy is just trying to correct faulty someone elses math, kind of like I'm trying to correct your faulty logic. Don't be such a tool.. I'll take to BOOs. Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickS Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 These mean absolutely nothing. They can be interpreted in 1o0 different ways. 103 could be highest win % because they have a ton of forfeits, and there is such a disparity between the couple of good wrestlers, and all the inexperienced or bad wrestlers at this weak weight. The other weights could have lower % because they are all good, and beat each other throughout the season. Just two examples ! Take it however you want it. I was just fixing the numbers from the other thread. The post wasn't really meant to be an opinion in itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts