It's sad, but I am all over the place with this one BECAUSE the media manipulates the public viewpoint. Case in point, a local kid is suing a school because his concerns of feeling pressure from other students was not recognized or followed up on to his satisfaction. He was being picked on, and the school didn't come to a resolution that was satisfactory to him.
Now the interviews on the local news say, "Well the teachers should be looking out for this kid. They should monitor his treatment and punish the kids that make him feel uncomfortable!" HUH!? WHAT!?!
So this kid wins the case and is awarded a large settlement (essentially sitting him up for life)...because the school didn't react strongly enough to protect him from feeling uncomfortable in class. Could it have had something to do with the fact that he was flaunting his homosexuality? Maybe, but the courts say that is his civil right and it has to be protected!!
That's tough for anyone to deal with. Now you take a recent HS grad and put him in a room full of kids (increasingly there is a chance that includes females also!) and expect him to not only be "mature" but also able to navigate the mine field that protection of civil rights and the resulting litigation has all District's in fear of.
Parents operate under the belief (right or wrong) that District's bare the sole responsibility for the child's health and welfare once they get on the bus or set foot on campus. When was the last time ANYTHING went south on a school campus and the news story interviewed people that said, "Well the kid was a bonehead /jack-off /slut /pot head /tramp /tease /skank /trouble maker/social deviant WHATEVER and there really wasn't much more the school could have done to stop him/her. The kid is definitely the one at fault here!"
Just imagine the interviews on campus when the scorned Sr. girlfriend of the recent grad or the puppy love stricken soph. girl tells the news how she was "molested" by the COACH! Trust me the lead news story would not be "Skank gets her panties in a bunch when rejected." But rather, "HS Wrestling coach accused of raping student..details at 11!" How many folks want to step in front of the firestorm of litigation that follows that one! Or something as simple as the kid that claims he isn't wrestling varsity because the "coach" is giving preferential treatment to his old buddies!!
A HC's job is filled with far more drama and politics than anyone should ever have to deal with. I am sure that if he felt the risk/reward was worth it, he would have fought hard(er) to get the kid in to the room. But if ANYTHING goes south, it's his a$$ in the grinder and he decided to let it go....my guess is that he had good reasons and legitimate concerns.
IF he truly wants to give back and stay involved (and make a little pizza $ along the way) he should take the test, get a whistle and start reffing.