Y2,
I think your goal seems to be involving more teams and kids in the state tourneys to hopefully help make the sport grow here and to make the IHSAA more money. Now I think the flaw with that is you water down the meaning of champions(because you will have multiple at each weight), and your arguement above is a poor one because it opens up more debate and questions on who's the best within the same year(you will always have woulda, shoulda, coulda arguements but the best that weekend are crowned). Yes people will always compare who was the best between kids from year to year, but creating those same questions within the same year is a big flaw.
Your best arguement is it may help grow the sport in our state but at the same time our state comes out with one true individual champ in each weight class, and I think a kid from a small school is at no disadvantages because he can wrestle outside his room outside the schools season as many of our champs do. Team state could only improve again by seeding the tournament so you get a true #1 & #2. But again I see your arguement and just prefer our current system, because I think yours creates even more questions and debate. Can we agree to disagree?