Jump to content

ZD44

Pee-Wee
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Articles

Coach

Teams

Team History

Wrestlers

Wrestler Accomplishments

Dual Results

Individual Results

Team Rankings

Individual Rankings Master

Individual Ranking Detail

Tournament Results

Brackets

College Signings

Media

State Bracket Year Info

Team Firsts and Lasts

Family History

Schedule-Main

Schedule-Details

Team History Accomplishments

Current Year Dual Results

Current Year Tournament Results

Forums

Events

Store

Downloads

Posts posted by ZD44

  1. 7 hours ago, Indysportsfan said:

    I could not agree less.  Annually for 10+ years I have created dozens of spreadsheets detailing the accuracy of the rankings.  IndianaMat rankings is incredibly accurate/consistent. I do not want the SS to be seeded, but if they did decide to do it, using the rankings would be an intelligent start for the 

    5 hours ago, FCFIGHTER170 said:

    Guarantee ppl would not drag their feet on reporting results! Some Ppl think rankings don't matter and in relation to getting your guy prepped for a guy and competing it doesn't but when it comes to getting a kid looked at for college (I know many big schools only care about grades and National scene usually) opportunites and having  educated insight on the quality and depth of our talent then Rankings are huge..

     

    Then you add the seeding purposes in this kind of scenario, if needed...I appreciate the heck out of the hard work these guys dedicate and volunteer and too many times does it get taken for granted..I think we're going in a better direction and would like to know if we're improving in the Result reporting @Y2CJ41 do you have any stats on that or a guess on that? I'm going to make it a obligation next year too at least report NC results better and insert big results that I see that haven't been entered in the significant result categories that I see across the board.. I'm a stat head and enjoy doing that stuff.. Anyways I think we all can agree there needs to be Wrestle backs at SS and state!

     

    I have an example of reporting that didn’t happen. In the case person that I was replying to, he said that 195 is a joke because 3 of the top four in semi state rankings are on the same side of the bracket. One of those kids from Westfield in the New Castle bracket, got pinned by the Southmont kid at the bottom of the bracket. South kid isn’t even ranked in the Semi State and Westfield kid is ranked in top 4. It definitely happened too. That’s just an example of how reporting plays a big factor in rankings.
  2. 7 hours ago, Indysportsfan said:

    I could not agree less.  Annually for 10+ years I have created dozens of spreadsheets detailing the accuracy of the rankings.  IndianaMat rankings is incredibly accurate/consistent. I do not want the SS to be seeded, but if they did decide to do it, using the rankings would be an intelligent start for the process.

    My point is that IndianaMat is fantastic but they do rely on people to report matches. If someone doesn’t report a match, then they don’t know that that happened. 

  3. 5 hours ago, JMAN said:

    WOW some of these brackets are a joke!  195 has 3 of the top 4 in semi-State rankings on one side of the bracket.  Someone needs to learn how bracketing works!

    Not a knock on Indiana Mat, but some of these rankings are inaccurate. To be fair, there are so many matches and wrestlers so it is hard to keep up with. Going off of rankings for the brackets would be very stupid. Go off of who that person beat and how he did in their regional.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.