WL wrestling
-
Posts
65 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Articles
Coach
Teams
Team History
Wrestlers
Wrestler Accomplishments
Dual Results
Individual Results
Team Rankings
Individual Rankings Master
Individual Ranking Detail
Tournament Results
Brackets
College Signings
Media
State Bracket Year Info
Team Firsts and Lasts
Family History
Schedule-Main
Schedule-Details
Team History Accomplishments
Current Year Dual Results
Current Year Tournament Results
Forums
Events
Store
Downloads
Everything posted by WL wrestling
-
Especially when its OUR commissioner that is doing the interpreting!
-
Commissioner Faulken's response was the 45-0 kid had no wins vs the entered wrestlers at the wt class so he could not be the number 1 seed unless the other guys had no wins on the field as well. That is correct: Jeff had 2 wins in the field, WL had 1 win, Delphi had 1 win and Har had 0 wins. It then went to win percentage for WL vs Delphi for 2 and 3 seeds, Harrison ended up 4.
-
I was in the meeting, his exact words, "Head to Head means number of matches vs the rest of the entered wrestlers at that wt class." My question to him was how many other sectionals seeding meetings are using this same interpretation of Head to Head tonight. His response was probably 50%, my guess was our meeting was the only one using this interpretation. We have 2 coaches of 30years+ and neither had ever heard of something like that. Anyone else's seeding meetings use his interpretation?
-
All 11 coaches in the meeting thought so too!
-
I was in the seeding meeting with Comissioner Faulkens last night, he was the one who laid it out that way. Trust me I was just as confused. Essentially the head to head component only applies to the number of wins vs others in the field. straight from his mouth. Give him a call and clarify it for yourselves.
-
Seeding criteria last night was explained like this: 1. Head to head wins: This meant the number of head to head wins in the weight class vs the other kids that are currently in that bracket. Ex. Wrestler A has 2 wins in the bracket, Wrestler B only has 1 win vs the rest of the field--Wrestler A automatically gets the higher seed even if wrestler B beat wrestler A and even if B has a better win percentage than A. Perfect example was at 182: Stallings (3 Seed) had one win vs the field, Powell (2 Seed) had 2. Stallings beat Powell and had a higher win percentage overall but still got the lower seed. Head to head as we know it is out the window.
-
West Lafayette
-
West Lafayette
-
West Lafayette
-
West Lafayette
-
West Lafayette
-
West Lafayette
-
West Lafayette
-
West Lafayette
-
West Lafayette
-
West Lafayette
-
West Lafayette
-
Here are the qualifications to participate in the RTCs. The practice is open to watch but these qualifications are needed to participate. http://content.themat.com/CoachesCorner/RTC-criteria.pdf
-
West Lafayette has 2 full mats 42X84
-
Lafayette Jefferson
-
West Lafayette
-
West Lafayette
-
West Lafayette
-
West Lafayette
-
West Lafayette
