How does that rule work with this:
"5-25-6c NEW; 7-6-6c NEW: Referees now have rules support for a stalling call against a wrestler who repeatedly creates a stalemate situation to simply prevent his/her opponent from scoring and not from his/her own attempt to score."
http://www.nfhs.org/web/2008/09/200809_nfhs_wrestling_rules_cha.aspx
If Eppert had the legs in before Wright stood up, Wright was the one repeatedly creating the stalemate situation.
eppert might have had his legs in but he wasnt trying to do ANYTHING on top stalling
The rule mentioned above actually gives no support for calling stalling in the situation where Eppert had the legs in and Wright was standing up since no "stalemate" was ever called. The call in each situation was (or should have been) "potentially dangerous" and not a "stalemate". Now, if the Official called stalling because, in his opinion, the top man was not working for the fall that would be his perogative, but it should have nothing to do with the rule mentioned above.