Y2 I agree that is a good thing, and I do see the merit in some of your points on the class system. I just personally dont feel that it is best for the intgerity of the sport. If we class it, all that means is that making it to state is less of an accomplishment. We have had eight state qualifiers in the history of our school. If it were classed I legitly believe that we would have had 8 in the last two seasons, I just dont think that is good for our sport. It makes a great accomplishment become something that goes to just average/ above average wrestlers. I think that advancing four to the semi-state has watered the semi-state down, and has made advancing out of regionals a much less impresive feat. I think that being a "semi-stater" has lost some of its luster. I think that at the semi-state that is exceptable, but not for the state finals, its for the best of the best, that is the point of it.
The weight class argument has been used on here before, and I canot see how some buy into this argument. Its the nature of our sport, it obviously needs weight classes this is a bogus argument.
Y2 I didn't see an answer to my earlier question- which do you think gives us a better idea of the true team champion a 14 man roster vs another 14 man roster, or the team that can produce the 5 best wrestlers? If its the best 5 wrestlers, then why waist time on the kids who are not ever going to be a state caliber wretler?