shoottowin

Hopefully when Andrew reads this thread he will comprehend it for what it was, a post about more Granbys being run in one match, than most folks had seen before. That isn't "making fun." It's an observation.

Nothing has been deleted. He's overreacting...plain and simple. The broadcasters talked about the Granbys too.

No problem. I won't wait that long. Nobody made fun of your brother. You're taking exception and picking a fight unnecessarily, but we can talk more in person.

Facts are facts tough guy.

With half the weight classes complete through the Quarters: (106-145) Only two kids from the Region still chasing a State Title! Both Portage. 2 out of 28. Wow!

With half the weight classes complete through the Quarters: (106-145) Only two kids from the Region still chasing a State Title! Both Portage. 2 out of 28. Wow!

...

His name escapes me...but where's the Culver expert?

Bambam, Why are you posting during practice?

Praying...

No, because it's more than one kid on more than one team, in multiple sectionals. Just seemed interesting for a good kid not to show up in a bracket.

Thank you XCard. Is there ever a reason to withhold a guaranteed 1 seed? Also, are the team rosters, which are on Track, the official rosters the ADs submitted?

When a coach does not submit a wrestler for seeding, but the wrestler is deserving of a high seed, what happens when that wrestler is added later? What's the advantage to not putting a seeded wrestler on your original Sectional roster?

Why do some schools omit good wrestlers, even obvious 1 seeds from their initial Sectional roster? Iirc, they can add them later, right? What's the advantage to adding them later?

3A 120: #3 #4 #5 #8 #9 #15