There are many things that make history. That doesn't make them praiseworthy. I have nothing against Kayla and she is to be commended for her hard work and dedication. However, as I have stated numerous times on this topic, none of that is relevant to the discussion. Did she make history? Yes. Did she work her ass off to do so? Of course. Should she be commended for that? Yes (with a caveat). Is it appropriate? Is it good? Is it right? Hell no. It is bad for so many reasons. Reasons that I have argued ad nausaem. None of the reasons people give in defense make a damn bit of difference. They are secondary to the question of whether or not it is right . And to come back to my original point, the fact that it is historical, or the fact that she worked hard, do not, in and of themselves, make it right.