O-C-W

Matty I find it very humorus that you feel the need to send me private messages telling me how it is obvious that I can't even form a sentence, and then make a post like the one above with all the spelling and grammer errors. Before you start trying to slam people about their intellegence level, you may want to make sure you are doing a better job yourself. I also find it funny that you guys are so defensive because you know what was said is correct and you guys set kids out that attend your club regularly for a title. That is classy, and really shows support for your team. It shows that you are doing this for your own self satisfaction and nothing for the kids. I hope these same kids that you did this to return the favor in high school and show you the exact same dedication that you have shown them. Here are the facts from the posts above. 4 kids not part of your school system or club as stated above. That is 22% of your team. That doesn't count the private club kids that you recruited for this specific meet. So we are looking at 30 to 40 percent of your team was not legit. I also like how you are all about the kids, but if not for this one meet, you would not have had anything to do with bettering these kids wrestling career that you brought in. In fact I was told that you didn't even coach these kids in the meets, and you had to let their private coach do the honors. You want to act like you are all about the kids, but tell the truth, what have you done for these kids before this (which was to benifit you and your ego. Not the kids.) You also keep mentioning that we should just be thankful the ISWA put this on. I have never one time said that I wasn't appreciateive for everything they do for the kids. i am very greatful for them and everything they do. They ahve nothing to do with this post.This is just your way to try to change the subject and get past the fact that you left kids out of this event, so you could get the title you obviously never won yourself as a kid.

Matty I am sure your team works very hard, and I agree you are working on creating a very solid program. I just hope with all the hard work you are putting in, you are actually letting the kids that work like this for you have the opportunity. I truly do hope the conversations that I had were false, and you didn't actually tell kids that wrestle for you on a daily and weekly basis that they couldn't participate because there was someone that lived in the area that was good, and technically they could be part of our team and they are better then you, so they are going to take your spot so we can win a elem. state title.

So with all the talk on who was eligable to wrestle for which school in the elem. duals, what team had the biggest facelift I had heard that Avon had a few ringers, and I see they won it. I was curious to see everyones opinion on if this was an issue or not. Below it was Avon questioning the rules on who was able to wrestle for their club quit a bit, so it didn't really suprise me when I heard that. Not to take anything away from Avon at all, just curious how this issue went? I won't go as far as to ask them for their Doctors information ;D

Yes, I agree, but if they wrestled in state, then they are in trackwrestling and you have the results of how they have done in the past. The only way they wouldn't be in there is if it was their first time at State. The State results should override any of the local tournements that are in there. I know no matter what system is used everyone will not be satisfied.

I agree. You would have to seed each weight class, and than break them into two pools. With trackwrestling, you would think that there would be a program that would rank each kid, and if there is not a profile for them, thenthe system would randomly draw them out? I would like to see this happen anyway for the state tournements. May not be possible, but it is nice to think about.

Does anyone know where the video's of the championship matches from this past weekend are? I would like to watch some of these again, but do not know where to look?