My son wrestled freestyle and Greco at a young age, and then we went through several years where there wasn't a program locally for him to learn the styles. He didn't really start doing freestyle again until his freshman year.
He absolutely loves Greco, and likes freestyle. He's went to a different RTC Monday-Thursdays each week and gets lots of instructions. He's went to the mandatory two qualifiers the last two years and will wrestle at ISWA state. He's getting pretty decent, but he's not elite level by any means.
But, having said that - I know he would still have wrestled the tourneys he did whether he had to as a qualifier or not. He wants to get better, and wants as many matches as possible - as I'm sure almost all wrestlers do.
Eliminating qualifiers all together is the way I'd vote. For us, qualifiers are great fun and a good measure for what improvements have been made. He expects to have fewer matches at a qualifier, than at state. For him, state is something special and he looks forward to seeing big brackets with 40 plus kids in it. Who cares if he goes 0-2, but wrestles well? I'm 100 percent for no qualifiers needed for state. State should be for the kids who want to prove they are the best, on that day.
I may be wrong, but I think participation at local tourneys will still be decent because wrestlers who are doing offseason want to compete.
One other thing. If my son goes out and wrestled well and wins state in a bracket with 12 kids, he would be proud - but I know he would be embarrassed by the fact that there were only a few kids at his weight.