Jump to content

Jay County Regional


DelCo

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, wrestleliferfan said:

138# 

Colt Rutter vs William Fiechter in the championship- who takes the title? 

If those two make it to the finals. The majority of the weight class looks like tough competition with McCammon, Wells, Meiring, and Jordan. 

Don’t count McCammon out, he’s unranked however he might give Fiechter a tough Semi. I have my money on Colt by bonus points against anyone he wrestles this weekend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DelCo said:

Don’t count McCammon out, he’s unranked however he might give Fiechter a tough Semi. I have my money on Colt by bonus points against anyone he wrestles this weekend

The semi finals will be the best matches I'm sure. Wells beat McCammon earlier in season, but lost to Meiring, McCammon beat Meiring at Sectionals, but didn't see the match. And I think McCammon beat Jordan as well. Was it a tough one, Meiring/McCammon, or by a mile? I could see a lot of 138's going either way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wrestleliferfan said:

The semi finals will be the best matches I'm sure. Wells beat McCammon earlier in season, but lost to Meiring, McCammon beat Meiring at Sectionals, but didn't see the match. And I think McCammon beat Jordan as well. Was it a tough one, Meiring/McCammon, or by a mile? I could see a lot of 138's going either way. 

Aye big dawg, Wells didn't beat McCammon earlier on in the season. Never faced him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wrestleliferfan said:

The semi finals will be the best matches I'm sure. Wells beat McCammon earlier in season, but lost to Meiring, McCammon beat Meiring at Sectionals, but didn't see the match. And I think McCammon beat Jordan as well. Was it a tough one, Meiring/McCammon, or by a mile? I could see a lot of 138's going either way. 

I don’t recall southern wells beating McCammon, however McCammon did beat Meiring twice this season. The scores were both close however McCammon handled the match both times. I wouldn’t be surprised if McCammon beats Wells. Those Semis will be super fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DelCo said:

I don’t recall southern wells beating McCammon, however McCammon did beat Meiring twice this season. The scores were both close however McCammon handled the match both times. I wouldn’t be surprised if McCammon beats Wells. Those Semis will be super fun.

Not 100% certain all of their common opponents but I do know South Adams 138 is one of them. McCammon won by tech fall 16-1 and Fiechter won by decision 6-3. common opponents arent always reliable due to styles, how a wrestler may be feeling that particular day, etc. but i do believe McCammon will take this match in route to a rematch with Rutter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DelCo said:

I don’t recall southern wells beating McCammon, however McCammon did beat Meiring twice this season. The scores were both close however McCammon handled the match both times. I wouldn’t be surprised if McCammon beats Wells. Those Semis will be super fun.

I don't think McCammon wrestles Wells in semi finals? I think he'd wrestle Fiechter in Semi Finals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

106

1. Miller  -SA

2. Todd - Y

3. Hutker - Bel

4. Lee-De

*First rd match to watch Johnson-Norwell vs Lee-Delta

112

1. B. Curtis Y

2. Zadylak - N

3. Rupp - SA

4. Robinson - De

120

1. Moser - AC

2. Atkins - JC

3. Schliessman - De

4. Tighe - Da

*Should be good (or bad depending how you look at it) first round matches which could go either way

126

1. Blackburn - De

2. X. Curtis - Y

3. Lawson - Be

4. Shaffer - AC

132

1. Barr - Y

2. Perry - SW

3. Wills - Da

4. Liter - AC

138

1. Rutter - Y

2. Fiechter - SW

3. McCameron - Mun Cen

4. Wells-UC

145

1. Hunt-Y

2. Young- Mun Cen

3. Ruble-Be

4. Mounsey - Bluf

152

1. Hiestand - Y

2. Macklin - AC

3. Beeks - SW / Moore - Win (1st rd battle)

4. Hemmelgarn - JC

160

1. Winner - JC

2. Bate - AC

3. Metz -Bel

4. Duncan -SW / Swanson - WD (solid1st rd match)

 170

1. Bell - Cowan

2. Prybylla - Mun. Cen

3. C. Friedt - Bel / S. Brown -De (1st rd battle to watch)

4. Chapman - JC

182

1. Abbott - Mun Cen

2. Grary - Nor

3. Stevens - Cowan

4. Wright - UC

195

1. Pease - Del

2. Lykins - JC

3. Shaffer -SA

4. Berlanga - AC

220

1. Hare - JC

2. Shumm - AC

3. Baumgartner - SA

4. Gerwigg - Bel / Brown - Da (1st rd battle to watch)

285

1. Parsons -Y

2. Baronick - Bla

3. Swallow - Mon. Cent / Cuellar - SA (1st rd match to watch)

4. Shaffer - Win / Hughes - Bluf (1st rd match to watch)

Yorktown runs away with team tittle followed by in no order AC, Jay Co., Bel, Delta.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

106

1. Miller  -SA

2. Todd - Y

3. Hutker - Bel

4. Johnson - Nor

(I do not see any of these 4 losing and I think you have a clear top 2 where Miller wins handilly, with an entertaining 3rd/4th matchup)

 

113

1. B. Curtis - Y

2. Zadylak - N

3. Robinson- Del

4. Rupp - SA

(Robinson and Ortiz is the best first round matchup but I expect Robinson to take it, no one challenges Curtis)

 

120

1. Moser - AC

2. Atkins - JC

3. Schliessman - De

4. Tighe - Da

(Again I do not see anyone besides these top 4 moving on, with no real entertaining matchups to look at besides the Delta sectional rematch of Schliessman and Tighe)

 

126

1. Lawson - Be

2. Blackburn - De

3. X. Curtis - Y

4. Shaffer - AC

(These top 4 should all qualify with a clear top 3, I like Lawson today with common opponent victories but wrestling is not won with the transitive property)

 

132

1. Barr - Y

2. Perry - SW

3. Liter - AC

4. Summersett - SA

(Great senior/freshman first round matchup in Summersett vs. Wills, I like the freshman in this one.  Barr will have some tough competition but I think he wins every match by at least 3)

 

138

1. Rutter - Y

2. McCammon - MC

3. Fiechter - SW

4. Meiring - WD

(Good ECIC rematch of Meiring and Wells, but I think Meiring gets it done again.  The match of the weight will be the semi of McCammon and Fiechter)

 

145

1. Hunt - Y

2. Young - MC

3. Ruble - Be

4. Mounsey - Bluf

(Best weight of the tournament where the only thing I know is that Christian Hunt will win, outside of that this weight will be fun the whole day, especially the very enticing Young and Ruble semi)

 

152

1. Macklin - AC

2. Hiestand - Y

3. Moore - W

4. Hemmelgarn - JC

(I like Macklin over Hiestand in the finals in a regional rematch from last year and the other first round matchups are very enticing, any of those 4 guys could qualify)

 

160

1. Winner - JC

2. Bates - AC

3. Metz -Bel

4. Swanson - WD

(A couple of good first round matchups here where Jay County could potentially sweep, Winner pins his way through again)

 

 170

1. Friedt - B

2. Chapman - JC

3. Bell - Cowan

4. Smith - SW

(Solid first round matchup of Prybylla and Smith but I like Smith in that one, clear top 3 here where I'll take the Belmont kid in a rematch, anyone of these 3 could win it though)

 

182

1. Abbott - Mun Cen

2. Gray - Nor

3. Frasher - JC

4. Wright - UC

(I think these 4 make it easily to Fort Wayne but I love the rematch of Gray and Abbott again in the finals, I'll take Abbott but don't count out this Knight)

 

195

1. Pease - Del

2. Lykins - JC

3. Enis - Y

4. Berlanga - AC

(Pease will run through this one but the remaining 2-4 spots are up for grabs, I like Enis to be a strong 3rd here)

 

220

1. Baumgartner - SA

2. Shumm - AC

3. Hare - JC

4. Gerwigg - Bel

(I'm calling the sweep here with a very strong 220 class from Jay County, I'll keep the same top 4 finish as well)

 

285

1. Parsons - Y

2. Swallow - Mon C

3. Shaffer - W

4. Baronick - Bla

(Weaker weight here with the loss of Shaw of Belmont and Dunn of Muncie Central pre-sectionals here but I like the Delta sectional to show out with the heavies, same 1-3 finish as last week with Baronick getting by, a lot of great first round matchups though)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

106

1. Miller 

2. Todd 

3. Lee

4. White

112

1. Curtis 

2. Zadylak 

3. Robinson 

4. Rupp

120

1. Moser

2. Atkins 

3. Schliessman 

4. Tighe 

126

1. Blackburn

2. Curtis

3. Lawson 

4. Shaffer

132

1. Barr 

2. Perry 

3. Liter

4. Summerset

138

1. Rutter 

2. Fiechter 

3. McCammon

4. Meiring

145

1. Hunt

2. Ruble

3. Young

4. Mounsey 

152

1. Hiestand

2. Macklin

3. Hemnelgarn

4. Beeks

160

1. Winner

2. Swanson

3. Bates

4. Metz

 170

1. Smith

2. Friedt

3. Chapman 

4. Bell

182

1. Abbott 

2. Grary

3. Wright

4. Frasher

195

1. Pease 

2. Lykins 

3. Enis

4. ulloim

220

1. Baumgartner 

2. Hare

3. Schumm

4. Gerwigg

285

1. Parsons

2. Baronick 

3. Shaffer

4. Cuellar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.