cradleU Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 Can someone P L E A S E do a simulated dual with these two teams with both at full strength? Who wins? ON THE RISE you had a pretty good seat at the Harvest, what do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ontherise219 Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 106- moran(1@113) vs cottey(1@106) 113 ??? Vs Kung(2nd) 120 peele(3rd)vs fair(1st) 126 poynter(1st) vs sturgis(7th) 132 Luna vs zepada(zepeda d 4-1) 138 rumph(dnp) vs lowery(1) 145 McIntosh vs servies(kasper man 17-7) 152 Washington vs warren(Washington 20-8) 160 Nugent(5th)vs Davis(1st) 170 Guerrero(3rd) vs warren(1st) 182 Torres vs bee-lo(below 3-1) 195 maceo(dnp)vs lane(3rd) 220 Swopes(1st) vs wehr(5th) 285 gooch did not place vs reaterill(3rd) There are some spot from a preseason line I received from Perry that are different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ontherise219 Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 Rough guess based off Saturday and previous results for the guys out of portage’s line up 106 portage major 113 Perry dec 120 toss us Saturday only Perry dec 126 portage pin 132 Perry dec 138 portage maj 145 portage maj 152 portage maj 160 Perry pin 170 Perry pin 182 Perry dec 195 portage dec 220 Portage maj 285 Perry dec portage 29-27 the difference at the harvest for me as a spectator was where portage was getting majors Perry was getting falls in the earlier rounds(where there wasn’t forfeits) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M109R Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, ontherise219 said: Rough guess based off Saturday and previous results for the guys out of portage’s line up 106 portage major 113 Perry dec 120 toss us Saturday only Perry dec 126 portage pin 132 Perry dec 138 portage maj 145 portage maj 152 portage maj 160 Perry pin 170 Perry pin 182 Perry dec 195 portage dec 220 Portage maj 285 Perry dec portage 29-27 the difference at the harvest for me as a spectator was where portage was getting majors Perry was getting falls in the earlier rounds(where there wasn’t forfeits) 36-28 PM Perry wins 8 matches . Edited December 3, 2017 by M109R Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cradleU Posted December 4, 2017 Author Share Posted December 4, 2017 I got it at 33-25 PORTAGE. I agree with all of your matchups, except that you have MORAN, RUMPH, McKINTOSH, and WASHINGTON, winning by majors (NO PINS?) I definitely feel like at least 2 of those guys if not all 4 can win by fall. You can also bump Washington to 160 and get bonus points there as well. Nugent vs Warren would be a good match up, can go easier way. Moran down at 106, Haskins in at 113, Rumph in at 138, Washington up at 160 changes EVERYTHING! Two very well coached teams, either way a fun dual to watch. Possibly PORTAGE 37 PERRY 22 Zombiedust 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombiedust Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 15 minutes ago, cradleU said: I got it at 33-25 PORTAGE. I agree with all of your matchups, except that you have MORAN, RUMPH, McKINTOSH, and WASHINGTON, winning by majors (NO PINS?) I definitely feel like at least 2 of those guys if not all 4 can win by fall. You can also bump Washington to 160 and get bonus points there as well. Nugent vs Warren would be a good match up, can go easier way. Moran down at 106, Haskins in at 113, Rumph in at 138, Washington up at 160 changes EVERYTHING! Two very well coached teams, either way a fun dual to watch. Possibly PORTAGE 37 PERRY 22 I have a hard time seeing Perry's 106, 113, 138, 145, 152, 160 giving up pins. Yes I agree those Portage kids are very talented, but I think that you're underestimating Perry's team and the ability/heart of their wrestlers. Their kids are solid and are always ready to bang heads. I agree it would be an exciting dual to watch and a close one too, but I personally believe it would be a lot closer than you're suggesting. Just my opinion though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MOWrestler Posted December 5, 2017 Share Posted December 5, 2017 22 hours ago, Zombiedust said: I have a hard time seeing Perry's 106, 113, 138, 145, 152, 160 giving up pins. Yes I agree those Portage kids are very talented, but I think that you're underestimating Perry's team and the ability/heart of their wrestlers. Their kids are solid and are always ready to bang heads. I agree it would be an exciting dual to watch and a close one too, but I personally believe it would be a lot closer than you're suggesting. Just my opinion though. Perhaps. Regardless, ZOMBIEDUST is a good beer. Zombiedust, EazyBLACK7 and ontherise219 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts