Jump to content
JC Patriots9

Jay County Sectional

Recommended Posts

106-

1. Zadylak

2. Miller

3. Mosser

4. James

 

113-

1. Harris

2. Shoaf

3. Liter

4. Fillers

 

120-

1. Mendez

2. Mosser

3. Sanders

4. Wynn

 

126-

1. Becker

2. Goodwin

3. Schwartz

4. Schwaller

 

132-

1. Gunsett

2. Dudelston

3. Strait

4. Wilson

 

138-

1. Macklin

2. Barkdull

3. Siefring

4. Compton

 

145-

1. Gutierrez

2. Beeks

3. Thieme

4. Hemmelgarn

 

152-

1. Bates

2. Leonard

3. Laughlin

4. Smith

 

160-

1. Busse

2. Perry

3. Hemmelgarn

4. Stuckey

 

170-

1. Baumgartner

2. Hummel

3. Ashley

4. McCune

 

182-

1. Kohler

2. Hankenson

3. Hicks

4. Douglas

 

195-

1. Baumgartner

2. Schumm

3. Roberts

4. Ostrowski

 

220-

1. Hare

2. Brunner

3. Butler

4. Baronick

 

285-

1. Schumm

2. Shaw

3. Adney

4. Ferguson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

106-

1. Zadylak

2. Miller

3. Mosser

4. James

 

113-

1. Harris

2. Shoaf

3. Liter

4. Fillers

 

120-

1. Mendez

2. Mosser

3. Sanders

4. Wynn

 

126-

1. Becker

2. Goodwin

3. Schwartz

4. Schwaller

 

132-

1. Gunsett

2. Dudelston

3. Strait

4. Wilson

 

138-

1. Macklin

2. Barkdull

3. Siefring

4. Compton

 

145-

1. Gutierrez

2. Beeks

3. Thieme

4. Hemmelgarn

 

152-

1. Bates

2. Leonard

3. Laughlin

4. Smith

 

160-

1. Busse

2. Perry

3. Hemmelgarn

4. Stuckey

 

170-

1. Baumgartner

2. Hummel

3. Ashley

4. McCune

 

182-

1. Kohler

2. Hankenson

3. Hicks

4. Douglas

 

195-

1. Baumgartner

2. Schumm

3. Roberts

4. Ostrowski

 

220-

1. Hare

2. Brunner

3. Butler

4. Baronick

 

285-

1. Schumm

2. Shaw

3. Adney

4. Ferguson

Great pics, very similar to what I was thinking. Only changes I would make would be Hankenson over Kohler, Siefring winning 138, Liter winning 113, and Dylan Zurcher sneaking out at 132.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

106-

1. Zadylak
2. Mosser
3. Miller
4. Moorman 

 

113-

1. Liter 
2. Shoaf
3. Harris 
4. Fillers

 

120-

1. Mosser 
2. Mendez
3. Sanders
4. Wynn

126-
1. Becker
2. Schwartz
3. Goodwin 
4. Atkins 

132-
1. Gunsett
2. Dudelston
3. Strait
4. Wilson

138-
1. Macklin
2. Siefring
3. Barkdull
4. Compton

 

145-

1. Beeks  
2. Gutierrez
3. Thieme
4. Hemmelgarn

152-
1. Bates
2. Leonard
3. Laughlin
4. Smith

160-
1. Busse
2. Perry
3. Hemmelgarn
4. Stuckey

170-
1. Baumgartner
2. Hummel
3. McCune
4. Ashley 

182-
1. Hankenson
2. Kohler
3. Hicks 
4. Gardner 

195-
1. Baumgartner
2. Schumm
3. Roberts
4. Ostrowski

 

220-

1. Brunner 
2. Hare 
3. Butler
4. Baronick

285-
1. Schumm
2. Shaw
3. Adney
4. Horner 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
106-
1. Zadylak
2. Mosser
3. Miller
4. Moorman

113-
1. Liter
2. Shoaf
3. Fillers
4. Harris

120-
1. Mosser
2. Mendez
3. Sanders
4. Wynn

126-
1. Becker
2. Swartz
3. Goodwin
4. Schwaller

132-
1. Gunsett
2. Dudelston
3. Strait
4. Brunner

138-
1. Macklin
2. Siefring
3. Barkdull
4. Compton

145-
1. Beeks 
2. Gutierrez 
3. Thieme
4. Hemmelgarn

152-
1. Bates
2. Leonard
3. Laughlin
4. Smith

160-
1. Busse
2. Perry
3. Hemmelgarn
4. Stuckey

170-
1. Baumgartner
2. Hummel
3. McCune
4. Ashley

182-
1. Hankenson 
2. Kohler
3. Gardner
4. Hicks

195-
1. Baumgartner
2. Schumm
3. Roberts
4. Ostrowski

220-
1. Brunner
2. Hare
3. Butler
4. Baronick

285-
1. Schumm
2. Shaw
3. Adney
4. Horner
Edited by TKO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't be a huge upset... I know Fillers lost to Wills from Muncie Central 3-2 and Wills beat Harris in OT... Should be competitive for sure...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Updated Brackets. South Adams now has forfeits at 113, 145, and 152. The only shuffling was at 152, the 6th seed moved to the 5th seed and forfeit now at the 6th seed.

Edited by littlevito

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

106-

1. Zadylak

2. Mosser

3. Miller

4. Moorman

 

113-

1. Liter

2. Shoaf

3. Fillers

4. Harris

 

120-

1. Mosser

2. Mendez

3. Sanders

4. Wynn

 

126-

1. Becker

2. Swartz

3. Goodwin

4. Schwaller

 

132-

1. Gunsett

2. Dudelston

3. Strait

4. Brunner

 

138-

1. Macklin

2. Siefring

3. Barkdull

4. Compton

 

145-

1. Beeks 

2. Gutierrez 

3. Thieme

4. Hemmelgarn

 

152-

1. Bates

2. Leonard

3. Laughlin

4. Smith

 

160-

1. Busse

2. Perry

3. Hemmelgarn

4. Stuckey

 

170-

1. Baumgartner

2. Hummel

3. McCune

4. Ashley

 

182-

1. Hankenson 

2. Kohler

3. Gardner

4. Hicks

 

195-

1. Baumgartner

2. Schumm

3. Roberts

4. Ostrowski

 

220-

1. Brunner

2. Hare

3. Butler

4. Baronick

 

285-

1. Schumm

2. Shaw

3. Adney

4. Horner

 Your "champions" for this weekend insinuate that you are one of two things.. 1.) Bias 2.) Have not watched many matches live.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Your "champions" for this weekend insinuate that you are one of two things.. 1.) Bias 2.) Have not watched many matches live.

Which "champions" do you disagree with? I think thats pretty accurate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Your "champions" for this weekend insinuate that you are one of two things.. 1.) Bias 2.) Have not watched many matches live.

Not sure i know what you mean by haven't watched a lot of matches I've been watching wrestling matches pretty much all year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.