Scrambler pro 1 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 I'll step up and ask if anyone has any predictions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
decbell1 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 I'll step up and ask if anyone has any predictions I predict there will be no argument for best beard award at the Jay Co Sectional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrestlingMan2 Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 Seeding meeting is Monday. I'm sure there will be more talking about it when the brackets come out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scrambler pro 1 Posted January 23, 2014 Author Share Posted January 23, 2014 Seeding meeting is Monday. I'm sure there will be more talking about it when the brackets come out. I get that but I'd like to see what some people are thinking before the brackets come out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azcoach Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 A lot depends on how healthy everyone is after their conference tournaments. Based on dual results, Bellmont looks to be the team to beat. But with no team tournament, the order of the day is to advance as many wrestlers as you can and avoid other sectional champions in the first round of regionals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlevito Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 Brackets will be available to the public at 11:00 p.m. tonight!! http://www.trackwrestling.com/predefinedtournaments/VerifyPassword.jsp?tournamentId=46011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigmak Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 Brackets will be available to the public at 11:00 p.m. tonight!! http://www.trackwrestling.com/predefinedtournaments/VerifyPassword.jsp?tournamentId=46011 its showing thursday at 8pm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlevito Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 They told us tonight before we walked out the door that they would be available at 11. I guess they fooled us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X_R A T E D Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 106: Mendez (BEL), Mosser (AC), Fillers (NOR), Geesaman (JC) 113: Becker (BEL), Abbot (JC), Gerber (SW), Wilson (NOR) 120: Miller (SA), Gunsett (BEL), Jenson (NOR), Kirkword (BF) 126: Gray (BEL), Ray (JC), Oliver (AC), Renner (SW) 132: Bates (AC), Huntker (BEL), Barkdull (BF), Beeks (SW) 138: Ellinger (AC), Beeks (SW), Nussbaum (SA), McCune (NOR) 145: Neher (BEL), Liter (AC), Marbach (SA), Perry (SW) 152: Braun (BEL), Finnerty (JC), Ring (UC), McCune (NOR) 160: Baumgartner (BEL), Angiiuano (UC), Hummle (JC), Christman (BF) 170: Luginbill (AC), Baron (UC), Kohler (JC), Conner (SA) Baker would be #2 if he is wrestling Saturday! 182: Hinshaw (SA), Smith (SW), Coshow (BEL), Terriquez (UC), 195: Friedt (BEL), Burk (UC), Robertson (JC), Studebaker (BL) 220: Fueling (AC), Shaneyfelt (BEL), Kilsby (SA), Moore (UC) 285: Hemmelgarn (JC), Bollenbacher (AC), Beachy (SA), Henry (UC) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spartan15 Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Is Baker from Bellmont injured, I don't see him in the 170 or 182 draws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrestlingMan2 Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Is Baker from Bellmont injured, I don't see him in the 170 or 182 draws. He will be wrestling at sectionals! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Humble Jr. Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 He will be wrestling at sectionals! Thanks Mr. know it all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Humble Jr. Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 106: Mendez (BEL), Mosser (AC), Fillers (NOR), Geesaman (JC) 113: Becker (BEL), Abbot (JC), Gerber (SW), Wilson (NOR) 120: Miller (SA), Gunsett (BEL), Jenson (NOR), Kirkword (BF) 126: Gray (BEL), Ray (JC), Oliver (AC), Renner (SW) 132: Bates (AC), Huntker (BEL), Barkdull (BF), Beeks (SW) 138: Ellinger (AC), Beeks (SW), Nussbaum (SA), McCune (NOR) 145: Neher (BEL), Liter (AC), Marbach (SA), Perry (SW) 152: Braun (BEL), Finnerty (JC), Ring (UC), McCune (NOR) 160: Baumgartner (BEL), Angiiuano (UC), Hummle (JC), Christman (BF) 170: Luginbill (AC), Baron (UC), Kohler (JC), Conner (SA) 182: Hinshaw (SA), Terriquez (UC), Smith (SW), Coshow (BEL) 195: Friedt (BEL), Burk (UC), Robertson (JC), Studebaker (BL) 220: Fueling (AC), Shaneyfelt (BEL), Kilsby (SA), Moore (UC) 285: Hemmelgarn (JC), Bollenbacher (AC), Beachy (SA), Henry (UC) wow these are really bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Humble Jr. Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 I haven't looked at the brackets yet, but these are my picks. 106 - Gerber - SA 113 - Goodwin - SA 120 - Miller - SA 126 - Boxell - SA 132 - Lahr - SA 138 - Nussebaum - SA 145 - Marbach - SA 152 - Pollard - SA 160 - Blomeke - SA 170 - Connor - SA 182 - Hinshaw - SA 195 - Pugsly - SA 220- Kilsby - SA 285 - Beachy - SA I could see maybe one or two Belmont or AC kids pushing SA in the finals, doubt it tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
74smack Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Predictions: 106: Mendez (BE), Mosser (AC), Fillers (NO), Geesaman (JC) 113: Becker (BE), Abbot (JC), Wilson (NO), Gerber (SW) 120: Miller (SA), Gunsett (BE), Jensen (NO), Gremaux (AC) 126: Gray (BE), Oliver (AC), Ray (JC), Renner (SW) 132: Hutker (BE), Bates (BE), Barkdull (BLA), Duddleston (JC) 138: Ellinger (AC), Beeks (SW), McCune (NO), Baker (BE) 145: Neher (BE), Liter (AC), Marbach (SA), Perry (SW) 152: Braun (BE), Finnerty (JC), Ring (UC), Ashley (AC) 160: Baumgartner (BE), Angiiuano (UC), Hummel (JC), Christman (BLA) 170: Luginbill (AC), Baker (BE), Kohler (JC), Baron (UC) 182: Hinshaw (SA), Smith (SW), Coshow (BE), Terriquez (UC) 195: Friedt (BE), Burk (UC), Robertson (JC), Pugsley (SA) 220: Shaneyfelt (BE), Fuelling (AC), Kilsby (SA), Moore (UC) 285: Hemmelgarn (JC), Bollenbacher (AC), Bulter (BE), Beachey (SA) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bog190 Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Predictions: 106: Mendez (BE), Mosser (AC), Fillers (NO), Geesaman (JC) 113: Becker (BE), Abbot (JC), Wilson (NO), Gerber (SW) 120: Miller (SA), Gunsett (BE), Jensen (NO), Gremaux (AC) 126: Gray (BE), Oliver (AC), Ray (JC), Renner (SW) 132: Hutker (BE), Bates (BE), Barkdull (BLA), Duddleston (JC) 138: Ellinger (AC), Beeks (SW), McCune (NO), Baker (BE) 145: Neher (BE), Liter (AC), Marbach (SA), Perry (SW) 152: Braun (BE), Finnerty (JC), Ring (UC), Ashley (AC) 160: Baumgartner (BE), Angiiuano (UC), Hummel (JC), Christman (BLA) 170: Luginbill (AC), Baker (BE), Kohler (JC), Baron (UC) 182: Hinshaw (SA), Smith (SW), Coshow (BE), Terriquez (UC) 195: Friedt (BE), Burk (UC), Robertson (JC), Pugsley (SA) 220: Shaneyfelt (BE), Fuelling (AC), Kilsby (SA), Moore (UC) 285: Hemmelgarn (JC), Bollenbacher (AC), Bulter (BE), Beachey (SA) I'm trying to figure out which team you follow........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Humble Jr. Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 I think he is a UC fan ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
74smack Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 I'm trying to figure out which team you follow........ It may be Bellmont heavy, but I'm pretty sure they showed that they have the upper hand in this very weak sectional. They dominated both AC and South Adams. Their stronger schedule prepares them just a little better come tournament time. I see it being a battle between AC and Jay County for second place. A lot of the matches could go either way, but I still see Bellmont with 7-9 champions, with 12-14 moving on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bog190 Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 It may be Bellmont heavy, but I'm pretty sure they showed that they have the upper hand in this very weak sectional. They dominated both AC and South Adams. Their stronger schedule prepares them just a little better come tournament time. I see it being a battle between AC and Jay County for second place. A lot of the matches could go either way, but I still see Bellmont with 7-9 champions, with 12-14 moving on. I don't disagree with you, Bellmont is clearly the favorite, and by a wide margin. Those predictions would be best case scenario for Bellmont. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
74smack Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 I don't disagree with you, Bellmont is clearly the favorite, and by a wide margin. Those predictions would be best case scenario for Bellmont. In all honesty, you never know what you will get with some of these teams. Teams like UC and Blackford always bring in guys with good records and then they go 0-2 at sectional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bog190 Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 In all honesty, you never know what you will get with some of these teams. Teams like UC and Blackford always bring in guys with good records and then they go 0-2 at sectional. Who was talking about UC and Blackford? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigmak Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 totally unbiased. i have no dogs in the fight. i just know a few of the wrestlers: 106 mendez (bel), mosser (ac) 113 abbot (jc), becker (bell) 120 miller (sa), gunsett (bel) 126 gray (bel), ray (jc) 132 bates (ac), hutker (bel) 138 ellinger (ac), nussbaum (sa) 145 liter (ac), marbach (sa) 152 braun (bel), finnerty (jc) 160 baumgartner (bel), anguiano (uc) 170 luginbill (ac), kohler (jc) 182 hinshaw (sa), terriquez (uc) 195 friedt (bel), burk (uc) 220 kilsby (sa), fuelling (ac) 285 hemmelgarn (jc), bollenbacher (ac) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
74smack Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Who was talking about UC and Blackford? I was just stating that because of the logic of putting certain people through or to win a match over kids from those schools. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Rex DoubleLeg Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 I haven't looked at the brackets yet, but these are my picks. 106 - Gerber - SA 113 - Goodwin - SA 120 - Miller - SA 126 - Boxell - SA 132 - Lahr - SA 138 - Nussebaum - SA 145 - Marbach - SA 152 - Pollard - SA 160 - Blomeke - SA 170 - Connor - SA 182 - Hinshaw - SA 195 - Pugsly - SA 220- Kilsby - SA 285 - Beachy - SA I could see maybe one or two Belmont or AC kids pushing SA in the finals, doubt it tho. Hinshaw winning 82? most of these are good but thats a little bold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Humble Jr. Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 It may be Bellmont heavy, but I'm pretty sure they showed that they have the upper hand in this very weak sectional. They dominated both AC and South Adams. Their stronger schedule prepares them just a little better come tournament time. I see it being a battle between AC and Jay County for second place. A lot of the matches could go either way, but I still see Bellmont with 7-9 champions, with 12-14 moving on. why are Bellmont people always comparing themselves to AC and SA? Aren't you supposed to dominate them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts