fwrestler Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Fwrestler, You are obviously so dense that you think because a heavyweight doesn't use a cradle that they are less skilled. Instead of realizing it is more difficult to use a cradle at those weights. Who said anything about a cradle? Although that is probably one of the moves that takes the most skill to hit from the top position... ;D it's obvious that heavies can't usually hit cradles due to their size, which is why I never mentioned it. Here's a question: if leg attacks aren't one of the techniques that work at the heavier weights, how does Sliga have so much success with the single leg (one of the most basic leg attacks)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosgrove Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 I would have to say [utting in legs properly is way tougher move to learn than a craddle from top position Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galagore Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Who said anything about a cradle? Although that is probably one of the moves that takes the most skill to hit from the top position... ;D it's obvious that heavies can't usually hit cradles due to their size, which is why I never mentioned it. Here's a question: if leg attacks aren't one of the techniques that work at the heavier weights, how does Sliga have so much success with the single leg (one of the most basic leg attacks)? If we are going to anecdotal about this, then I will throw in that against Jeremiah Harvey, it was a terrible idea to attempt a leg attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2CJ41 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 If we are going to anecdotal about this, then I will throw in that against Jeremiah Harvey, it was a terrible idea to attempt a leg attack. I would hit low singles and super ducks on him day and night...BLINDFOLDED because I am immensely more skilled due to wrestling a lower weight class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jchas Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 You have to remember. That this half of the post was started by a straight up attack on the light weights by a heavy weight. We are the defendants in this case. I think the case rests. Court adjourned! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarlHungus Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 You have to remember. That this half of the post was started by a straight up attack on the light weights by a heavy weight. We are the defendants in this case. I think the case rests. Court adjourned! Not true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jchas Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Whatever the little guys don't matter. I think we should just do away with 106 and add another heavier weight class. All of the 106 pound kids cut to much weight anyways. It starts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aoberlin Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 It starts Sorry I get bored sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jchas Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Did anyone say a thing about 103? All I said is that light weights don't deserve to wear a singlet. The Fire! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2CJ41 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 If you follow aoberlin's posts he only believes there should be weights under 132lbs. All the rest are filled with wrestlers that are far less superior and far less skilled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aoberlin Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 If you follow aoberlin's posts he only believes there should be weights under 132lbs. All the rest are filled with wrestlers that are far less superior and far less skilled. Not sure I can remember ever posting anything that negative about the upper weights. I obviously have my opinions, but I have just sat back and watched this one unfold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aoberlin Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 My opinion is this. The really great upper weight wrestlers, and I am not talking average, wrestle like the lighter weights. It is that simple. Wrestling is wrestling. A great double leg works at all levels. You just have to be strong enough for your size to do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabio Jr. Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 I agree with you aoberlin, I just think that the number of those kinds of wrestlers is much lower the higher up you get due to style changes...definatly something you notice...look at guys like dexter larimore just freak athletes then you have guys like randy morin who literally had 1 move (a front head lock) and were extremely successful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TripleB Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 It's okay Big Guys... Trips has love... Big guys pull way more love from the femme's than those pansy light weights... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2CJ41 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 It's okay Big Guys... Trips has love... Big guys pull way more love from the femme's than those pansy light weights... You are proof positive of that! You definitely out punted your coverage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosgrove Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 hahah now this has gone t obig guys get more girls hahaha idk if its from heavyweights feeling what they got "girl features hahah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benni hanna 79 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Our heavyweight is too small to have boobs thank you very much. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jchas Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 The scientific term is "He Hooters" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1gold Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 120 and 126 will be up for grabs and probably will have some of the most exciting match ups . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosgrove Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 hahhah He Hooters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raging Hornet Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 I was just trying to say Heavier weights seem to have less depth in their weight class but this year Id say its improving Id do any thing for them right now because we have none :'( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts