Jump to content

Big 8 Conference Seeds


B-Rabbit

Recommended Posts

103 Suar MV, Schitter JA, Nawl VL, Lutz PR

112 Karges PR, Kersteins JA, Hemmings BO, Boger VL

119 Allen BO, Hubbard PR, Eckert JA, Drew WA

125 Chevaz JA, Osha WA, Heuring BO, McCarter VL

130 Chambers JA, Hoehn MV, Griesemer PR, Meza WA....GOOD SEMI-FINAL WITH HOEHN AND GRIESEMER! 3 returning Conference Champs at this weight!

135 Konrath MV, Meyer PR, Meza WA, Houck MC

140 Ennis BO, Collon JA, Velazquez WA, Hatfield PR....Dallas MV is also here, blind draw in

145 Seiler BO, Ackerman JA, Garrett MC, Rynkiewich MV

152 Marshall MV, Koberstein PR, Dunlap VL, Stenftenagel JA

160 Schwenk JA, Haire BO, Blanford MV, DeHosse PR

171 Stein PR, Tucker JA, Osborne MV, Wampler MC

189 Ewers MV, Henrickson BO, Halbig PR, Cissel WA

215 Roberts MV, Hedrick WA, Jenkins JA, Camp BO

285 Crum MC, O'Connell MV, Breen PR, Schnell JA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no way Chambers(JA) should be seeded above Hoehn from (MV). Hoehn Majored Kelley(CE) and Kelley beat Chambers. Also Griesemer from (Pr) has been 125 all year so unless he bumped up then that is wrong as well, but i do agree, if he did bump up that would be on heck of a match. Will be fun to watch!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 3 wrestlers had no common opponents and no head to head competition.  The criteria came to returning champ or runner-up in the same weight class.  Based on that criteria, Chambers earned the no. 1 seed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Kelly (Central) not a common opponent?  or did all 3 wrestlers have to have a common opponent?

 

Yes, they all need to have a common opponent.  Hoehn beat Kelly, who beat Chambers.  That would seed Hoehn above Chambers.  However, neither of them had any common opponents with Griesemeir.  So that throws out the common opponent criteria.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats true, but in that case i think heohn shoulda been 1st seed for sure; then one of the other 2. ive seen all 3 wrestle and yes, Chambers may look good as far as on paper goes but the championship will be in the semi-finals, im predicting the winner of the 2 and 3 seed to major Chambers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats true, but in that case i think heohn shoulda been 1st seed for sure; then one of the other 2. ive seen all 3 wrestle and yes, Chambers may look good as far as on paper goes but the championship will be in the semi-finals, im predicting the winner of the 2 and 3 seed to major Chambers

 

But you have to use the criteria set up.  You can't just give someone a seed because you think he's the best wrestler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.