tskin Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 103lbs 1. Rieker CE 33-5 2. Gibson MA 24-8 3. Schroeder SW 37-4 4. Bullock BC 26-7 5. Orben CN 14-12 6. Kelly SB 29-14 112lbs 1. Colon CN 31-2 2. Taylor MS 30-6 3. Rieker CE 30-10 4. Resch JC 22-10 5. Fehler BNL 22-14 6. Gary SB 25-17 119lbs 1. Rieker (CE) 28-11 2. Albertson (CN) 23-13 3. Innman (BNL) 15-15 4. Holley (JC) 22-14 5. Brown (Sey) 6. Parker (SW) 16-24 125lbs 1. Adams MA 17-11 2. McGaha CN 19-17 3. Smith BC 10-10 4. Carlile CE 20-17 5. Miller JC 16-13 6. Lloyd SE 20-23 130lbs 1. Q Richey BC 25-0 2. Reitman JC 33-6 3. Winter CN 28-7 4. Smith SW 31-9 5. Davis SB 17-9 6. Lewis MA 13-10 135lbs 1. Richey BC 30-0 2. Marthin MA 34-6 3. Brawner SW 26-11 4. Fleetwood CE 8-6 5. Hughes CN 11-11 6. Petty SB 21-21 140lbs 1. Wojdyla BC 30-1 2. Armand JC 35-2 3. Milenbaugh CN 21-3 4. Ogle CE 12-15 5. Sandlin SB 17-20 6. Blackwell BNL 8-25 145lbs 1.Wadell CN 30-8 2. Whalen MA 27-12 3. Wathan JC 15-18 4. Lauderbaugh SW 23-13 5. Everhart BNL 18-16 6. McCauley SE 11-9 152lbs 1. Howard SB 27-4 2. Bryant CE 28-10 3. Holt CN 20-10 4. Owen SE 17-8 5. Renoll JC 11-7 6. Fish MA 12-14 160lbs 1. Beiswanger JC 33-4 2. Rodgers SB 38-6 3. Brielrly CE 30-9 4. Asher MA 25-11 5. Harrell CN 13-18 6. Eaglen SE 12-15 171lbs 1. Watson CN 35-2 2. Biggs JC 31-8 3. Barger SE 18-9 4. Chasteen SB 30-8 5. Carroll SW 13-28 6. Huddleston CE 6-17 189lbs 1. Kopitzke JC 34-6 2. Henderson SB 25-5 3. Brownfield CN 6-1 4. Sons MA 17-14 5. Blackwell BNL 17-16 6. Smith CE 6-10 215lbs 1. Smith SW 23-2 2. Collett JC 31-7 3. Rice MA 13-15 4. McPike BNL 18-14 5. Stone SB 11-8 6. Leggins BC 13-6 HWT 1. Gill CN 35-2 2. Rust SE 19-4 3. Caum JC 22-13 4. Blakemore MA 13-6 5. Chastain BNL 8-6 6. Moore CE 9-15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cewrestlingfan Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 119 1. Rieker (CE) 28-11 2. Albertson (CN) 23-13 3. Innman (BNL) 15-15 4. Holley (JC) 22-14 5. Brown (Sey) 6. Parker (SW) 16-24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cewrestlingfan Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 152 1. Howard (SB) 27-4 2. Bryant (CE) 28-10 3. Holt (CN) 20-10 4. Owens (SE) 17-8 5. Renoll (JC) 11-7 6. Fish (MA) 12-14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cewrestlingfan Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 160 1. Beiswanger (JC) 33-4 2. Rodgers (SB) 38-6 3. Brierly (CE) 30-9 4. Asher (MA) 25-11 5. Harrell (CN) 13-18 6. Eaglen (SE) 12-15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cewrestlingfan Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 171 1. Watson (CN) 35-2 2. Biggs (JC) 31-8 3. Barger (SE) 18-9 4. Chasteen (SB) 30-8 5. Carroll (SW) 13-28 6. Huddleston (CE) 6-17 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cewrestlingfan Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 189 1. Kopitzke (JC) 34-6 2. Henderson (SB) 25-5 3. Brownfield (CN) 6-1 4. Sons (MA) 17-14 5. Blackwell (BNL) 17-16 6. Smith (CE) 6-10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cewrestlingfan Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 215 1. Smith (SW) 23-2 2. Collett (JC) 31-7 3. Rice (MA) 4. McPike (BNL) 18-14 5. Stone (SB) 6. Leggins (BC) 13-6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chanmdsn Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Beaner2: You were right @ 112. I apparently don't know how seeding meetings go. How does Colon get seeded first losing to Reiker? And if our info is correct Resch beat Reiker twice and gets seeded below him??? (could be getting bad info) I'm assuming Armand's second loss was to Wojdyla do to him getting seeded behind him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cewrestlingfan Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 285 1. Gill (CN) 35-2 2. Rust (SE) 19-4 3. Caum (JC) 22-13 4. Blakemore (MA) 13-6 5. Chastain (BNL) 8-6 6. Moore (CE) 9-15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cewrestlingfan Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Beaner2: You were right @ 112. I apparently don't know how seeding meetings go. How does Colon get seeded first losing to Reiker? And if our info is correct Resch beat Reiker twice and gets seeded below him??? (could be getting bad info) I'm assuming Armand's second loss was to Wojdyla do to him getting seeded behind him? Your information was incorrect. Rieker and Resch were 1-1 with Rieker winning the last meeting this past weekend. Colon had the best record and we did not challenge him being the #1 seed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cewrestlingfan Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 At 140 Armand is the #1 seed and Wojdyla is #2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2016GrecoGold Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 I though Milenbaugh beat Wojodyla? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cewrestlingfan Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 I though Milenbaugh beat Wojodyla? I don't think they wrestled each other. Wojdyla had only 1 loss and it was to Armand. Armand had 2 losses 1 to Welch and the other to Duncan. Milenbaugh has 3 losses 1 to Welch, 1 to Armand and the other to Kesterman I think that is correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STARSMAN Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Lets hear some predictions! who you think is going to make it out??!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STARSMAN Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toe shoes Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 I though Milenbaugh beat Wojodyla? I don't think they wrestled each other. Wojdyla had only 1 loss and it was to Armand. Armand had 2 losses 1 to Welch and the other to Duncan. Milenbaugh has 3 losses 1 to Welch, 1 to Armand and the other to Kesterman I think that is correct. Milenbaug beat welch. He lost to Tonte Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STARSMAN Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 out of curiosity...how are the teams supposed to finish by the way that seeds go?? i always find this interesting after the fact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattM Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 When I get a few minutes I'll work of a team rankings based on seeds, but you know those always turn out perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STARSMAN Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Thanks Matt ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattM Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 OK I did the team ranking based on the seeds using this formula. 7pts=1st 6pts=2nd 5pts=3rd 4pts=4th 3pts=5th 2pts=6th 1pt=having a wrestling not seeded (since they could score points) 0pts=forfeit (can't score points) If anyone has a better formula be my guest to put up your own team ranking based on seeds but this is the best I could come up with. Obviously this is not based on actual tournament points awarded but until bonus points and advancement point are earned its impossible to predict who would get them Team Rankings 1. Columbus North 70pts 2. Jennings Country 63 pts 3. Madison 54 pts 4. Columbus East 51pts 5. Scottsburg 41pts 6. Brown County 37pts 7./8. Seymour 29pts 7./8. Southwestern 29pts 9. Bedford 25pts While this should be a ballpark idea on what could happen, lets see what ends up occuring after Saturday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cewrestlingfan Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 OK I did the team ranking based on the seeds using this formula. 7pts=1st 6pts=2nd 5pts=3rd 4pts=4th 3pts=5th 2pts=6th 1pt=having a wrestling not seeded (since they could score points) 0pts=forfeit (can't score points) If anyone has a better formula be my guest to put up your own team ranking based on seeds but this is the best I could come up with. Obviously this is not based on actual tournament points awarded but until bonus points and advancement point are earned its impossible to predict who would get them Team Rankings 1. Columbus North 70pts 2. Jennings Country 63 pts 3. Madison 54 pts 4. Columbus East 51pts 5. Scottsburg 41pts 6. Brown County 37pts 7./8. Seymour 29pts 7./8. Southwestern 29pts 9. Bedford 25pts While this should be a ballpark idea on what could happen, lets see what ends up occuring after Saturday. 1st 16 points 2nd 12 points 3rd 9 points 4th 7 points 5th 5 points 6th 3 points 2 point for advancement in championship bracket 1 point for advancement in consolation bracket 2 points for fall, forfeit, default or disqulification 1.5 points for tech fall 1 point for major decision Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattM Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Yes that is the tournament point breakdown. I'd would have loved to use it to determine team rankings based on seeding but it doesn't work out perfectly since we don't know everyones bonus or even advancment points until it plays out. As I said I guess we will find out Saturday how it actually plays out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STARSMAN Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 really looks like bonus points are going to play a huge role this weekend in placement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattM Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Indeed. Bonus points (both gaining and not giving many up), how you preform if you end up in the consolation bracket, and even wrestling hard in the 5th and 6th place match always play a huge factor. The coach that can get his team to truely understand the importants of all of these factors has a better chance of moving higher than their original placement position. Every year you see at least one team suprises in the end from those factors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beaner2 Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Beaner2: You were right @ 112. I apparently don't know how seeding meetings go. How does Colon get seeded first losing to Reiker? And if our info is correct Resch beat Reiker twice and gets seeded below him??? (could be getting bad info) I'm assuming Armand's second loss was to Wojdyla do to him getting seeded behind him? Thanks. Not very often I'm right. Not gonna broadcast my predictions other than which schools should send the most to Reg. CN - 11 JC - 10 MA - 9 CE - 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts