Griffith

NFHS 2022 Wrestling Rules Book Rule 4-3 Special Equipment ART. 5 Wrestlers shall not wear wristbands, sweatbands, bicep bands or leg or arm sleeves that do not contain a pad during a match. NFHS 2022 Wrestling Case Book 4.3.5 SITUATION: Wrestler B reports to the scorer's table wearing: (a) sweatbands; (b) wristbands; (c) bicep bands; or (d) arm/leg sleeve(s) that do not contain padding. RULING: Technical violation in (a), (b), (c) and (d). Any wrestler reporting to the scorer's table wearing sweatbands, wristbands, bicep bands or arm/leg sleeve(s) without padding is not properly equipped. Wrestler B would be charged an injury time-out and will have 1½ minutes of injury time in order to become properly equipped and ready to wrestle. He/she would also be penalized with a technical violation and a match point will be awarded to the opponent.

Mr. Caprino is correct, ONLY the officials at the event your athlete is completing at can make the decision in this knee brace. Official A may have been OK with the brace on Wednesday. Official X, Y & Z may not be OK with the brace on Saturday. I have added the NFHS information, this is the information officials use to make these decisions From 21/22 NFHS Rules Book Rule 3-1 Referee and their Duties ART. 2 On matters of judgment, the referee shall have full control of the match and the decisions shall be final, based upon the NFHS wrestling rules and interpretations. The referee has the sole authority for ruling on infractions or irregularities not covered within the NFHS wrestling rules. ART. 6 The legality of all equipment, including mats, markings, uniforms and special equipment, pads and taping, shall be decided by the referee. A referee’s time-out shall be declared for the purpose of correcting legal equipment which becomes illegal or inoperative through use. Rule 4-3 Special Equipment ART. 1 Special equipment is defined as any equipment worn that is not required by rule. Any equipment which does not permit normal movement of the joints and which prevents one’s opponent from applying normal holds/maneuvers shall not be permitted. Special equipment includes, but is not limited to: b. any protective equipment which is hard and/or abrasive must be covered and properly padded with a closed-cell, slow-recovery foam padding no less than ½-inch thick From 21/22 NFHS Case Book In the first round of an invitational wrestling tournament, the 126-pound wrestler from School A reports to the scorer’s table wearing a knee brace that has excessive padding and wrapping. The coach of the wrestler has a letter from a physician indicating that this individual is allowed to wear a knee brace. What is the jurisdiction of the referee in this situation? RULING: It is legal to wear a knee brace. The rule states that any protective equipment which is hard and/or abrasive must be covered and properly padded with a closed-cell, slow-recovery foam padding no less than ½-inch thick. The rule also states that it must permit normal movement of the joints and cannot prevent one’s opponent from applying normal holds/maneuvers. If, in the referee’s opinion, a knee brace that is wrapped so that it is very large and bulky and would be a disadvantage to one’s opponent, the referee shall rule it to be illegal regardless of a physician’s statement. The referee makes the judgment call on any knee brace as the decision must fit the guidelines as presented in the rules. The wrestler from School A would be charged an injury time-out and will have 1½ minutes of injury time in order to become properly equipped and ready to wrestle. He/she would also be penalized with a technical violation and a match point will be awarded to the opponent.

Hall's Tavern at Coventry, Saras Family Restaurant, Chapman's Brewing Company

Best Hospitality room for 2017. Bremen Super Duals 1/21/2017

*

Mr. Faulkens will be at this meeting to answer weight management questions.

2016 Coaches and Officials Panel Monday, December 12, 2016 7:00 PM Sponsored by St Joseph Valley Athletic Officials’ Association What: A Coaches’ and Officials’ Panel discussion concerning high school wrestling. This is a non-confrontational open discussion and exchange of views on “How we see it from the bench” and “How we see it from the mat”. This is a tremendous opportunity to get questions answered concerning the current season, address areas to be emphasized for the remainder of the season, engage in open discussions, or just meet other coaches and officials in a setting away from the mat. Who: All Indiana High School Wrestling Coaches and Wrestling Officials When: Monday, December 12, 2016 at 7:00 PM Where: Beef O Brady’s 12749 Indiana SR 23 Granger, Indiana What to bring: You & the coaching staff It is not required, but if you know you will attend, please drop an e-mail to: Roger Griffith at rogergriffith@frontier.com so we can have an idea of how much food to have at the start of the Panel. Hope to see you on December 12th!

THANKS to all of the coaches who attended tonight meeting. As was said during the meeting we may agree to disagree on some issue BUT we agree that we need to support the sport of WRESTLING. Thanks to Robert Faulkens for sharing his thought with the the group tonight.

SJVAOA Coaches Panel What: A Coaches’ and Officials’ Panel discussion concerning high school wrestling. This is a non-confrontational open discussion and exchange of views on “How we see it from the bench” and “How we see it from the mat”. This is a tremendous opportunity to get questions answered concerning the current season, address areas to be emphasized for the remainder of the season, engage in open discussions, or just meet other coaches and officials in a setting away from the mat.

Joe What is the price for the decal with Karl's autograph?

By JOHN IRVING Published: February 15, 2013 IN A.D. 393, the ancient Olympic Games were abolished — they had become too corrupt. Wrestling was among the first sports in those ancient Games; wrestling was also included at the start of the modern Olympics, in 1896 Yet on Tuesday in Lausanne, Switzerland, the executive board of the International Olympic Committee voted by secret ballot to eliminate wrestling, starting in 2020. At the same meeting, it voted to keep the modern pentathlon. You might have missed the modern pentathlon last summer in London, where only 26 countries participated in the combined shooting, horseback-riding, running, swimming and fencing event. In the same Olympics, there were wrestling medalists from 29 countries. In other words: more countries won medals in wrestling than competed in the modern pentathlon. Globally, the TV audience for wrestling averages 23 million viewers. The modern pentathlon averages 12.5 million. An I.O.C. spokesman said of Tuesday’s vote, “It’s not a case of what’s wrong with wrestling.” It’s a matter of what’s right with the other sports, he claimed. But what to think about the board member Juan Antonio Samaranch Jr. of Spain? The son of a former I.O.C. president, he is also a vice president of the International Modern Pentathlon Union. In the international wrestling community, talk of his conflict of interests is understandably widespread. The I.O.C. decision isn’t the end. Wrestlers can appeal. There’s an executive board meeting in May in St. Petersburg, Russia, and a final vote in September. But why didn’t the sport of wrestling have sufficient representation before the secret vote in Lausanne? Many in the wrestling community blame FILA, the sport’s international federation. Bill Scherr, a former American wrestler who won a bronze medal at the 1988 Olympics, remembers talking to some I.O.C. members during his efforts to support Chicago as the host for the 2016 Olympics; based on those conversations, he told FILA that wrestling might be in trouble. Of his warnings, Mr. Scherr said, “In no way were they heeded.” He has also said, and I agree with him, that FILA probably presumed that wrestling’s status as an ancient Olympic sport would protect it. FILA said it was “greatly astonished” by the I.O.C. vote. Michael Novogratz, a New Yorker and former Princeton wrestler — and chairman of the inner-city wrestling program Beat the Streets — has said that FILA “just did not do a great job of selling the merits of the sport.” No one I regularly talk to in the wrestling community would disagree with that assessment. What I hear, repeatedly, is that FILA has antiquated leadership. Clearly, wrestling needs advocates; FILA isn’t doing the job. Since the vote in Lausanne, I’ve been asked many times: “How can anyone know what 15 members who vote by secret ballot really think?” Just two of the board’s members come from countries where wrestling is an actively promoted sport. Yet 180 countries wrestle, and only 53 engage in the modern pentathlon. Wrestlers from 71 countries went to London last summer; before they could compete, they had to win some of the toughest qualifying tournaments in the world. And while the United States has won the most Olympic medals in wrestling, Russia currently dominates the sport, and there have been many medal winners from Cuba, Finland, Iran, Turkey and South Korea — and, more recently, since the fall of the Soviet Union, from Azerbaijan, Georgia and Uzbekistan. If the executive board’s vote is upheld, will the elimination of wrestling as an Olympic sport hurt wrestling at high school and collegiate programs in the United States? Certainly. High school participation has expanded by 40,000 wrestlers in the last decade; more than 270,000 high school students wrestle, including more than 8,200 women. There are 21 intercollegiate women’s wrestling teams and, since 1999, 95 new college wrestling programs. But if American wrestling is strong, in recent years international wrestling has done significant damage to itself. Just look at the stupid rules for overtime: the defeatist ball draw (in which, roughly, a wrestler draws a colored ball to determine his or her position) and the unfair “clinch” (as it’s called); these are such bad rules that people who don’t know wrestling can’t understand them, even when I explain them. Knowledgeable American fans dislike the sport’s international rules. I was in Iowa City in 2012 for the United States Olympic trials; when a match came down to overtime, there was a groan from the 14,000 faithful in Carver-Hawkeye arena. These fans are among the most savvy and appreciative in American wrestling; yet what I heard was their skepticism, truly their disgust, each time there was a ball draw or the clinch. These rules are certifiable crowd-killers, while the TV coverage of other combat sports — boxing, taekwondo and judo — is increasingly as popular as (or more popular than) wrestling. Olympic boxing is far from being the world’s best boxing; Olympic wrestlers are the world’s best. I like taekwondo; I like judo. But wrestling shouldn’t be losing the TV audience to them. In the ancient Games — as early as 708 B.C. — they were wrestling. Granted, some of those early wrestling matches were settled by brutal means; many matches ended in death. Think what matches ending in death might do for wrestling’s TV ratings. Death would beat the ball draw, or the clinch; almost everyone can understand death. I’m kidding, of course. Seriously, FILA is doing an inadequate job of representing and protecting the sport I love, and thanks in part to its inadequacy, the executive board of the I.O.C. has been able to make a decision as underhanded and wrong as the corruption that brought an end to the ancient Olympic Games in A.D. 393. We need new leadership at FILA, and we need both more transparency and more responsibility from the International Olympic Committee. John Irving is the author of 13 novels. A former wrestler and coach, he was inducted into the National Wrestling Hall of Fame in 1992. A version of this op-ed appeared in print on February 16, 2013, on page A19 of the New York edition with the headline: How Wrestling Lost the Olympics.

25-25MHS Jim Nice job and thanks for taking time both days to help wrestling. 4 unsigned post DON'T talk for the wrestling community.

Chocolate Chip Cookies 8)

I think the likeness of Karl is better. :D ;D

That hurt my feelings :'(