Jump to content

bog190

Gorillas
  • Posts

    405
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Articles

Coach

Teams

Team History

Wrestlers

Wrestler Accomplishments

Dual Results

Individual Results

Team Rankings

Individual Rankings Master

Individual Ranking Detail

Tournament Results

Brackets

College Signings

Media

State Bracket Year Info

Team Firsts and Lasts

Family History

Schedule-Main

Schedule-Details

Team History Accomplishments

Current Year Dual Results

Current Year Tournament Results

Forums

Events

Store

Downloads

Everything posted by bog190

  1. Quad view seems to be working now.
  2. Looks like they're back up and as shown on the IHSAA show.
  3. Looks like they'll be on track at 6 ET.
  4. There is a pretty clear difference in these two teams, in that one can mathematically qualify for the event and the other cannot, and one can mathematically win a dual against a full team while the other cannot. You are using IHSAA logic with the "best team" garbage. Narrowing the classes makes the event better, I think it's pretty hard to debate that. As much as I disagree with you every year on these topics, I, and I'm sure others, appreciate that you are one of the few that actually posts the logic behind your votes on this stuff.
  5. I don't know if I haven't paid enough attention or if it's not been posted here, but this seems like a pretty good compromise. It's silly regardless to include teams that can't win a dual. It's unfortunate that the committee doesn't make their reasoning public on these topics, and instead rely on you to be the middle man.
  6. At Fort Wayne 152 #17 Fielden (Garrett) vs #9 Macklin (Adams Central) in round one with the winner likely seeing #6 Stroud (Elkhart Central) in the ticket round. Ouch.
  7. Which is the biggest flaw in the system, very few actually know how it works and casual fans have little chance at grasping it.... But it's the best we have.
  8. Fair enough. I just don't see any way that it makes sense to include teams in the classification process that will not have programs in the year being qualified for.
  9. Still interested in your "argument issues" here...
  10. I wasn't going to say that, but I was thinking it. I think it's pretty clear I posted first.
  11. What argument issues would you be referring to? You are in favor of keeping schools that will not exist next year in the classification for next year? Zero logic in that.
  12. I would enjoy hearing the logic against wrestlebacks.
  13. Far from "for entertainment purposes only" but thanks for the clarification.
  14. Come on, that's just untrue. They determine what regional 4th placer doesn't score for his team while a phantom fifth placer does. Incredibly misleading for you to say they have nothing to do with the qualification process.
  15. Seems like a big win if no one else has beaten Martz, not sure what record has to do with it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.